Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;10(4):1588–1595. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1397

Table 2. Per procedure and outcome data.

Variable Value
No. patients 150
Age (years) 52.1±14.2 [19–87]
Sex
   Male 104 (69.3)
   Female 46 (30.7)
BMI (kg/m2) 23.3±4.5 (17.7–36.2)
Stone size (mm) 7.2±3.4 (3.0–37.0)
SSD (mm) 95.6±15.2 (65.3–134.7)
HU 673.6±267.9 (184–1,416)
Side
   Right 73 (48.7)
   Left 77 (51.3)
Location
   Proximal 82 (54.7)
   Mid 5 (3.3)
   Distal 63 (42.0)
Preoperative Cr 0.93±0.23 (0.56–1.6)
Preoperative eGFR 92.5±51.2 (45.3–129.5)
Total No. ESWL 1.5±0.9 [1–8]
ESWL intensity
   a–c 6 (4.0)
   1 36 (24.0)
   2 85 (56.7)
   3 23 (15.3)
Pain during ESWL
   None 77 (51.3)
   Mild 69 (46.0)
   Severe 4 (2.7)
SFR after each session
   1st 98 (65.3)
   2nd 125 (83.3)
   3rd 135 (90.0)
Complications (Clavien-Dindo)
   Grade 1 3 (2.0)
      Voiding difficulty 1
      Hematuria 2
Alpha blocker 120 (80.0)

Values are presented as mean ± SD (range) and/or frequency (%) appropriate. BMI, body mass index; SSD, skin-to-stone distance; HU, Hounsfield units; ESWL, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.