Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;10(4):1588–1595. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1397

Table 3. Logistic regression analysis for different factors affecting the success rate after the first ESWL session.

Variable Univariate Multivariable*
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Age (continuous) 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.563
Sex (female) 0.99 (0.48–2.06) 0.984
Body mass index (continuous) 0.99 (0.87–1.12) 0.878
Stone size (continuous) 0.67 (0.55–0.81) 0.001 0.81 (0.66–0.99) 0.049
SSD (continuous) 1.01 (0.98–1.03) 0.519
HU (continuous) 0.95 (0.98-0.99) 0.001 0.99 (0.98–0.99) 0.001
Ureteral stone location
   Proximal Ref
   Mid 0.86 (0.14–5.47) 0.878
   Distal 1.24 (0.62–2.48) 0.544
Preoperative eGFR (continuous) 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.988
ESWL intensity
   a–c Ref
   1 1.50 (0.23–9.61) 0.669
   2 0.79 (0.14–4.54) 0.790
   3 0.94 (1.40–6.28) 0.947

*, significant variables (P<0.2) according to the univariate analysis were included in the multivariable analysis. SSD, skin-to-stone distance; HU, Hounsfield units; ESWL, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.