Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr 11;271(1):101–110. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020-01127-w

Table 1.

Patient group characteristics

tDCS
Gender (male/female) 7/9
Age (mean ± SD), years 42.8 ± 10.9
HDRSa
 Baseline 21.6 ± 3.9
 Week 3 14.3 ± 6.1
 Week 10 13.8 ± 10.1
PA
 Baseline 17.1 ± 6.3
 Week 3 21.5 ± 9.1
 Week 10 25.0 ± 11.4
NA
 Baseline 29.6 ± 9.3
 Week 3 26.4 ± 11.4
 Week 10 21.8 ± 10.1
STAI—state
 Baseline 54.6 ± 10.1
 Week 3 51.6 ± 13.4
 Week 10 48.3 ± 16.4
STAI—trait
 Baseline 65.6 ± 6.3
 Week 3 60.6 ± 11.5
 Week 10 54.3 ± 17.7
Emean (V/m)
 DFLP—left 0.317 ± 0.055
 DLFPC—right 0.332 ± 0.059
 ACC—left 0.153 ± 0.030
 ACC—right 0.145 ± 0.030

Distribution of characteristics, clinical outcomes, and mean electric field strength of the four main analyzed regions. Values are displayed as mean ± standard deviation

HDRS Hamilton depression rating scale, PA positive affect, NA negative affect, STAI state–trait anxiety inventory, Emean Mean electric field strength inside ROI, DLPFC dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ACC anterior cingulate cortex

a

Scores on the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale (0–52, the higher the more severely depressed)