Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001781.pub3
Trials of intralesional interferons
Study Intervention Results Outcome
Berman 1986 IFN‐alpha vs placebo Results suggest that IFN‐alpha is an effective treatment Cure in 2/4 (50%) vs 1/4 (25%) at 8 weeks
Horn 2005 Intralesional skin test antigen vs antigen + IFN‐alpha vs IFN‐alpha vs saline Intralesional immunotherapy is an effective treatment for warts. Interferon did not significantly enhance the response rate and did not differ from normal saline 57/95 (60%) antigen vs 25/106 (24%), saline, or IFN had resolution of at least 1 wart
Lee 1990 IFN‐gamma: high‐dose vs low‐dose vs placebo Significantly higher response rate with high‐dose interferon but also a higher rate of systemic side‐effects Cure in 20/36 (56%) vs 16/53 (30%) vs 6/36 (17%) at 4 weeks.
Fever in 71% and 25% of high‐dose and low‐dose groups
Niimura 1990 IFN‐beta vs placebo IFN‐beta significantly better than placebo. No adverse effects Cure in 42/64 (66%) vs 7/64 (11%) at 10 weeks
Pazin 1982 IFN‐alpha vs placebo IFN‐alpha significantly better than placebo Cure in 5/12 (42%) vs 0/4 (0%) warts at 15.5 weeks
Vance 1986 IFN‐alpha: high‐dose vs low‐dose vs placebo No significant difference between any of the groups Cure in 4/30 (13%) vs 7/32 (22%) vs 8/38 (21%) at 12 weeks
Varnavides 1997 IFN‐alpha vs placebo No significant differences Cure in 12/23 (52%) vs 12/19 (63%) at 24 weeks