Sharquie 2007.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | This study was carried out in a secondary care setting. This study was blinded. It was unclear if ITT analysis was carried out This study was conducted in Iraq. |
|
Participants | 90 participants were recruited: 23 dropped out. Inclusion criteria of the trial
|
|
Interventions |
These were applied 3 times daily for 4 weeks. |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes of the trial
|
|
Notes | ‐ | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation was computerised (additional information came from the trial investigator). |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation concealment was unclear. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote ('Methods', page 1418): "...double blinded study." Containers were labelled by a third person and the contents were unknown by the treating doctor or participant until the end of the study. (page 1419). |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote ('Methods', page 1418): "...double blinded study." No further details were given about the blinding of outcome assessors. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 23/90 participants dropped out (did not complete therapy). It was unclear which intervention group(s) the dropouts belonged to. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes were reported. |