Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;51(2):331–341. doi: 10.1002/eji.202048753

Table 1.

Bivalent analyte model parameters of LAG‐3:Fc binding to HLA‐DR1

Fit [Analyte] (μM) Rmax (RU) RI (RU) χ 2 kon1 (M−1 s−1) koff1 (s−1) kon2 (M−1 s−1) koff2 (s−1) KD1 (M) KD2 (M) KD1 (μM)
Local 7.1 1190 6.6 39.6 7.24 × 104 0.439 156.6 4.30 × 10−3 6.06 × 10−6 2.75 × 10−5 6.06
Global 0.1 – 7.1 962 4.6 – 16.9 27.6 5.22 × 104 0.380 96.9 4.10 × 10−3 7.28 × 10−6 4.23 × 10−5 7.28

[Analyte] = Concentration of injected LAG‐3:Fc analyte, RU = Response units,

Rmax = Maximum analyte binding capacity in RU, RI = Bulk refractive index effect in RU,

χ2=(observedexpected)2expected; lower χ2 values indicate better model fitting.

*Kon2 was converted to M−1 s−1 via the following equation: kon2 (M−1 s−1) = kon2 (RU−1 s−1) × 100 × molecular weight of LAG‐3:Fc [44, 45].

KD1= the affinity equilibrium dissociation constant (monovalent component).

KD2 = the affinity equilibrium dissociation constant (bivalent component).