Skip to main content
. 2021 May 3;7:e506. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.506

Table 2. Comparison of the proposed SSL-SPYCT methods to their supervised counterparts and SSL-PCTs in single tree setting in terms of number of wins.

Bolded values indicate that the sign test Demsar06 showed significant difference in performance at α = 0.05.

#wins L = 25 L = 50 L = 100 L = 250 L = 500
1-SSL-SPYCT-GRAD 20 19 21 19 14
vs. 1-SPYCT-GRAD
1-SSL-SPYCT-SVM 20 18 18 17 20
vs. 1-SPYCT-SVM
1-SSL-SPYCT-GRAD 21 18 22 18 20
vs. 1-PCT-SSL
1-SSL-SPYCT-SVM 22 18 18 19 16
vs. 1-PCT-SSL