Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 26;17(4):e1009464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009464

Fig 3. Type I error rates of different TWAS methods in prioritizing genes of diverse tissue specificity properties.

Fig 3

Type I error rate was the probability that TWAS wrongly identified a gene-trait association as significant while there was not any signal simulated in the dataset. Association p-values were controlled for the number of genes and tested tissues. X-axis is the number of gene-expressing tissues. Each column stands for the proportion of eQTLs that are shared among tissues for a gene. Each row is the similarity of gene expression profiles across tissues which is estimated by correlation. Moving from the top left to the bottom right is a gradient spectrum from tissue-specific genes to broadly expressed genes. The colors represent different TWAS methods and y-axis is the type I error rate. All TWAS methods had controlled type I error rates (≤ 5%).