Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Dec 7;77(5):673–683.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.11.005

Table 3:

Performance of Estimating Equations in the External Validation Dataset

Equation Description
Performance
Group Equation Number Year of Publication Filtration markers Demographics Overall Population
1-P30 RMSE
Equation with Creatinine only 1. Ref (2009)10 Creatinine Age, sex, race 11.8 (10.5, 13.2) 0.199 (0.193, 0.206)
Equations with Cystatin C 2. Ref (2012)47 Cystatin C Age, sex 17.4 1 (15.9, 18.88) 0.262 1 (0.250, 0.274)
3. New (2020) Cystatin C-B2M-BTP Age, sex, race 14.8 2 (13.4, 16.2) 0.256 2 (0.243, 0.268)
4. New/Recommended (2020) Cystatin C-B2M-BTP Age, sex 15.6 2 (14.2, 17.1) 0.259 2 (0.247, 0.271)

Equations with Creatinine and Cystatin C 5. Ref (2012)47 Creatinine -Cystatin C Age, sex, race 9.4 1 (8.2, 10.6) 0.199 1 (0.191, 0.206)
6. New (2020) Creatinine - Cystatin C-B2M-BTP Age, sex, race 8.4 5, 3 (7.3, 9.5) 0.195 5, 3 (0.187, 0.203)
7. New/Recommended (2020) Creatinine -Cystatin C-B2M-BTP Age, sex 8.6 5,4 (7.5, 9.8) 0.197 5, 4 (0.188, 0.205)

1-P30 and RMSE are measures of accuracy. 1-P30 is computed as 100 percent minus the percent of estimates greater than 30% of the measured GFR; RMSE, root mean square error; B2M, Beta2-Microglobulin; BTP, Beta-Trace Protein; A, age; S, sex; R, race;

Reference equations are the 2009 CKD-EPI creatinine equation (1), 2012 CKD-EPI cystatin C equation (2), and 2012 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation (3). The superscript number indicates the comparator equation, and formatting of the superscript informs direction of the comparison. No underline marking indicates that the equation is better than the comparator equation for a p-value ≤ 0.05; an underline marking indicates that the equation is worse than the comparator equation for p-value ≤ 0.05. Double underline indicates that the equation is neither better nor worse than the comparator equation P >0.05.