Table 1:
Linear mixed-effects models for the effect of PPT score on cognitive scores
| Independent variable type |
Outcome variable |
B-coefficient | 95% CI (low) |
95% CI (high) |
Adjusted p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline PPT score | SDMT | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.139 |
| Phonemic fluency | 0.19 | −0.01 | 0.39 | 0.326 | |
| Delayed recognition | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.322 | |
| Delayed recall | −0.03 | −0.09 | 0.03 | 0.640 | |
| New dot | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.345 | |
| Digit-span | 0.03 | −0.02 | 0.08 | 0.634 | |
| Odd-man-out | −0.01 | −0.06 | 0.04 | 0.696 | |
| PPT score (time-varying) | SDMT | 0.39 | 0.25 | 0.53 | < 0.001 |
| Phonemic fluency | 0.14 | −0.05 | 0.33 | 0.548 | |
| Delayed recognition | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 1.000 | |
| Delayed recall | 0.01 | −0.04 | 0.07 | 1.000 | |
| New dot | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.354 | |
| Digit-span | 0.00 | −0.05 | 0.05 | 1.000 | |
| Odd-man-out | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.390 |
Two linear-mixed effects models were constructed for each cognitive test (dependent variable). For models measuring the effect of baseline PPT (score at enrollment) on cognitive test score over time, baseline values were also used for all other adjusting covariables. For the non-baseline models, the values at each follow-up assessment were used for all covariables. Baseline cognitive test score was used to adjust all models. B-coefficients (unstandardized coefficients) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) correspond to the relationship between bimanual PPT score (independent variable) and the indicated neuropsychological test. P-values for baseline and longitudinal models were separately adjusted using the Holm method, using the number of tests (7) as the number of multiple comparisons. Covariables adjusted for in all models include sex, education (years), age, disease duration, UPDRS III subsections (rigidity, postural tremor, postural instability, hand movements), and Hoehn & Yahr stage.