Skip to main content
. 2021 May 6;11:9735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89122-6

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparison of key, pain-related brainstem nuclei and lumbar spinal cord laminae activated by hind paw stimulation with low intensity mechanical force (0.16 g) at chronic stages of neuropathic pain (43 days post-nerve injury) in SNI mice receiving repetitive M1 tDCS or 0 mA sham stimulation over 35–39 days post-nerve injury. The control group received no mechanical stimulation (control). (A) Typical examples of immunohistochemistry for the neuronal activity marker protein Fos with nuclear counterstaining with DAPI (scale bar = 100 µm) over ventrolateral periaqueductal grey (vlPAG) and lateral PAG (LPAG). (B,C) Quantitative analysis of Fos-expressing cells over LPAG (B) and vlPAG (C); n = 12 sections from 4 mice in the repetitive M1 tDCS group (with mechanical stimulation) and the sham treatment group (with or without mechanical stimulation), n = 9 sections from 3 mice in repetitive M1 tDCS group (without mechanical stimulation). (D,E) Typical examples of Fos immunohistochemistry with DAPI counterstaining (D; scale bar = 200 µm) or quantitative summary (E) over superficial laminae (I and II) in L3–L5 lumbar spinal cord segments; n = 6–12 sections were processed from each of 4 mice per group. Images were acquired with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica LAS X, version 3.3.0), imported to Fiji-Image J software (version 1.50b). In all panels, ANOVA for random measures was performed, followed by Sidak’s test for multiple comparisons. *Indicates p < 0.05 as compared to the corresponding sham treatment group, # indicates p < 0.05 as compared to control in the sham treatment group and the repetitive M1 tDCS group, respectively. Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M.