Table 1.
Test | Detection type | Positive rate | Time | Characteristics | Limitations | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qRT-PCR | nucleic acid detection | 38% | >2h | Currently the most common detection method, simple quantitative detection. | Time-consuming, poor sensitivity | (Liu R. et al., 2020) |
ELISA | Immunological detection | 80.4% | >2h | Fast, easy to operate, low sample volumes | Cross-reactivity, Antibodies are produced about 7-10 days after infection. | (Liu W. et al., 2020) |
RT-LAMP | nucleic acid detection | 92.9% | 40–60 min | Highly sensitive, fast, and convenient field testing | Prone to false positives | (Baek et al., 2020) |
CRISPR-based detection | nucleic acid detection | 96% | 30-60min | Highly sensitive, high specificity, fast and convenient for field testing., low-cost | Not yet widespread and in clinical trials | (Patchsung et al., 2020) |
ddPCR | nucleic acid detection | 40% | NA | Absolute quantification, high sensitivity | Expensive equipment, poor accessibility, and complexity of the operation | (Suo et al., 2020) |
CT Scan | Radiological Screening | NA | NA | Check for disease progression, easy access, rapid detection | Unable to identify the pathogen of infection, clinical assistant tests | (Dong et al., 2020) |