Table 1.
n= 34 | % | |
---|---|---|
Country | ||
China | 6 | 17.65 |
USA | 6 | 17.65 |
Italy | 4 | 11.76 |
Bangladesh | 2 | 5.88 |
Iran | 2 | 5.88 |
Singapore | 2 | 5.88 |
Spain | 2 | 5.88 |
Belgium | 1 | 2.94 |
Brazil | 1 | 2.94 |
France | 1 | 2.94 |
Israel | 1 | 2.94 |
Jordan | 1 | 2.94 |
Lebanon | 1 | 2.94 |
Malaysia | 1 | 2.94 |
Pakistan | 1 | 2.94 |
UK | 1 | 2.94 |
Global (cross-sectional surveys) | 2 | 5.88 |
Type of study | ||
Qualitative, thematic analysis | 17 | 50.00 |
Qualitative, case study or report | 8 | 23.53 |
Mixed methods (e.g. survey with some open-ended questions) | 5 | 14.70 |
Qualitative, narrative analysis | 2 | 5.88 |
Qualitative, phenomenological approach | 2 | 5.88 |
Participantsa | ||
Nurses | 15 | |
Physicians | 15 | |
Pharmacists | 4 | |
Respiratory therapists | 1 | |
Medical assistants | 2 | |
Physical therapist | 1 | |
Department supervisors | 3 | |
Laboratory technicians | 3 | |
Social workers | 2 | |
Administrative workers | 3 | |
Community healthcare workers | 2 | |
Home care agencies’ workers | 2 | |
Public health stakeholders | 2 | |
Unspecified | 3 |
aAdds up to more than 35 due to multiple types of participant in the studies. One cross-sectional survey involved multiple types of participant involved in delivering maternal and new born healthcare and is not included in the participant breakdown