Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;23(4):e25759. doi: 10.2196/25759

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Author, year Study design Sample characteristics Hospital (country) Evaluation outcomes
Abràmoff et al, 2018 [25] Observational study (prospective) 819 patients 10 primary care clinics (United States) APa (sensitivity, specificity, imageability rate)
Aoki et al, 2020 [26] Experimental study (cross-over design) 6 physicians The University of Tokyo Hospital (Japan) COb (reading time, mucosal break detection rate)
Arbabshirani et al, 2018 [27] Observational study (prospective) 347 routine head CTc scans of patients Geisinger Health System (United States) AP (AUCd, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity)
CO (time to diagnosis)
Bailey et al, 2013 [28] Crossover RCTe 20,031 patients Barnes-Jewish Hospital (United States) POf (ICUg transfer, hospital mortality, hospital LOSh)
Barinov et al, 2019 [29] Experiment (within subjects) 3 radiologists NRi AP (AUC)
CO (diagnostic accuracy)
Beaudoin et al, 2016 [30] Observational study (prospective) 350 patients (515 prescriptions) Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (Canada) AP (number of triggered recommendations, precision, recall, accuracy)
Bien et al, 2018 [31] Experimental study (within subjects) 9 clinical experts Stanford University Medical Center (United States) AP (AUC)
CO (specificity, sensitivity, accuracy)
Brennan et al, 2019 [32] Nonrandomized trial 20 physicians An academic quaternary care institution (United States) AP (AUC)
CO (risk assessment changes, AUC, usability)
Chen et al, 2020 [33] RCT 437 patients Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University (China) CO (blind spot rate)
Connell et al, 2019 [34] Before-after study 2642 patients Royal Free Hospital, Barnet General Hospital (United Kingdom) PO (renal recovery rate, other clinical outcomes, care process)
Eshel et al, 2017 [35] Observational study (prospective) 6 expert microscopists Apollo Hospital, Chennai (India); Aga Khan University Hospital (Kenya) AP (sensitivity, specificity, species identification accuracy, device parasite count)
Giannini et al, 2019 [36] Before-after study 22,280 patients in the silent period, 32,184 patients in the alert period 3 urban acute hospitals under University of Pennsylvania Health System (United States) AP (sensitivity, specificity)
PO (mortality, discharge disposition, ICU transfer, time to ICU transfer, clinical process measures)
Ginestra et al, 2019 [37] Survey 43 nurses and 44 health care providers A tertiary teaching hospital in Philadelphia (United States) CO (nurse and provider perceptions)
Gómez-Vallejo et al, 2016 [38] Observational study (retrospective) 1800 patients (2569 samples) A Spanish National Health System hospital (Spain) AP (accuracy)
CO (system perceptions)
Grunwald et al, 2016 [39] Observational study (retrospective) 15 patients, 3 neuroradiologists A comprehensive stroke center (Germany) AP (e-ASPECTS performance)
Kanagasingam et al, 2018 [40] Observational study (prospective) 193 patients, 4 physicians A primary care practice in Midland (Australia) AP (sensitivity, specificity, PPVj, NPVk)
Keel et al, 2018 [41] Survey 96 patients St Vincent’s Hospital, University Hospital Geelong (Australia) AP (sensitivity and specificity, assessment time)
PO (patient acceptability)
Kiani et al, 2020 [42] Experimental study (within subjects) 11 pathologists Stanford University Medical Center (United Kingdom) AP (accuracy)
CO (accuracy)
Lagani et al, 2015 [43] Observational study (prospective) 2 health care providers Chorleywood Health Centre (United Kingdom) AP (system performance)
CO (usability)
Lin et al, 2019 [44] RCT 350 patients 5 ophthalmic clinics (China) AP (accuracy, PPV, NPV)
CO (time to diagnosis)
PO (patient satisfaction)
Lindsey et al, 2018 [45] Experimental study (within subjects) 40 practicing emergency clinicians Hospital for Special Surgery (United States) AP (AUC)
CO (sensitivity, specificity, misinterpretation rate)
Liu et al, 2020 [46] RCT 1026 patients No. 988 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA (China) CO (ADRl, PDRm, number of detected adenomas and polyps)
Mango et al, 2020 [47] Experimental study (within subjects) 15 physicians 13 different medical centers (United States) AP (AUC, sensitivity, specificity)
CO (AUC, interreliability, intrareliability)
Martin et al, 2012 [48] Observational study (prospective) 214 patients 13 different medical centers (United States) AP (sensitivity, PPV)
PO (ACSCn, care-supported activities)
McCoy and Das, 2017 [49] Before-after study 1328 patients Cape Regional Medical Center (United States) PO (hospital mortality, hospital LOS, readmission rate)
McNamara et al, 2019 [50] Observational study (prospective) 3 breast cancer experts John Theurer Cancer Center (United States) CO (decision making)
Mori et al, 2018 [51] Observational study (prospective) 791 patients, 23 endoscopists Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital (Japan) AP (NPV)
CO (time to diagnosis)
Nagaratnam et al, 2020 [52] Observational study (retrospective) 1 patient Royal Berkshire Hospital (United Kingdom) PO (patient care and clinical outcomes)
Natarajan et al, 2019 [53] Observational study (prospective) 213 patients Dispensaries under Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (India) AP (sensitivity, specificity)
Nicolae et al, 2020 [54] RCT 41 patients Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (Canada) AP (day 30 dosimetry)
CO (planning time)
Park et al, 2019 [55] Experimental study (within subjects) 8 clinicians Stanford University Medical Center (United States) CO (specificity, sensitivity, accuracy interrater agreement, time to diagnosis)
Romero-Brufau et al, 2020 [56] Pre-post survey 81 clinical staff 3 primary-care clinics in Southwest Wisconsin (United States) CO (attitudes about AIo in the workplace)
Rostill et al, 2018 [57] RCT 204 patients, 204 caregivers NHS, Surrey and Hampshire (United Kingdom) CO (system evaluations)
PO (early clinical interventions, patient evaluations)
Segal et al, 2014 [58] Observational study (prospective) 16 pediatric neurologists Boston Children’s Hospital (United States) CO (diagnostic errors, diagnosis relevance, number of workup items)
Segal et al, 2016 [59] Observational study (prospective) 26 clinicians Boston Children’s Hospital (United States) CO (diagnostic errors)
Segal et al, 2017 [60] Structured interviews 10 medical specialists Geisinger Health System and Intermountain Healthcare (United States) CO (system perceptions)
Segal et al, 2019 [61] Observational study (prospective) 3160 patients (315 prescription alerts) Sheba Medical Center (Israel) AP (accuracy, clinical validity, and usefulness)
PO (changes in medical orders)
Shimabukuro et al, 2017 [62] RCT 142 patients University of California San Francisco Medical Center (United States) PO (LOS, in-hospital mortality)
Sim et al, 2020 [63] Observational study (prospective) 12 radiologists 4 medical centers (United States and South Korea) AP (sensitivity, FPPIp)
CO (sensitivity, FPPI, decision change)
Steiner et al, 2018 [64] Experimental study (within subjects) 6 anatomic pathologists NR CO (sensitivity, average review per image, interpretation difficulty)
Su et al, 2020 [65] RCT 623 patients, 6 endoscopists Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (China) CO (ADR, PDR, number of adenomas and polyps, withdrawal time, adequate bowel preparation rate)
Titano et al, 2018 [66] RCT 2 radiologists NR CO (time to diagnosis, queue of urgent cases)
Vandenberghe et al, 2017 [67] Observational study (prospective) 1 pathologist and 2 HER2 raters NR CO (decision concordance, decision modification)
Voerman et al, 2019 [68] Before-after study NR Five Rivers Medical Center, Pocahontas (United States) CEq (average total costs per patient)
PO (numbers of patients with clostridium difficile and antibiotic-resistant infections, LOS, antibiotic use)
Wang et al, 2019 [69] RCT 1058 patients, 8 physicians Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital (China) CO (ADR, PDR, number of adenomas per patient)
Wang et al, 2019 [70] RCT 75 patients 4 primary care clinics affiliated with Brigham and Women’s Hospital (United States) CO (anticoagulation prescriptions)
Wang et al, 2020 [71] RCT 962 patients Caotang branch hospital of Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital (China) CO (ADR, PDR, number of adenomas and polyps per colonoscopy)
Wijnberge et al, 2020 [72] RCT 68 patients Amsterdam UMC (Netherlands) PO (median time-weighted average of hypotension, median time of hypotension, treatment, time to intervention, adverse events)
Wu et al, 2019 [73] Observational study (prospective) 3600 residents 3 ophthalmologists, community healthcare centers (China) AP (AUC)
CO (ophthalmologist-to-population service ratio)
Wu et al, 2019 [74] RCT 303 patients, 6 endoscopists Renmin hospital of Wuhan University (China) AP (accuracy, completeness of photo documentation)
CO (blind spot rate, number of ignored patients, inspection time)
PO (adverse events)
Yoo et al, 2018 [75] Observational study (prospective) 50 patients, 1 radiologist NR (Korea) AP (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy)
CO (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy)

aAP: application performance.

bCO: clinician outcomes.

cCT: computed tomography.

dAUC: area under the curve.

eRCT: randomized controlled trial.

fPO: patient outcomes.

gICU: intensive care unit.

hLOS: length of stay.

iNR: not reported.

jPPV: positive-predictive value.

kNPV: negative-predictive value.

lADR: adenoma detection rate.

mPDR: polyp detection rate.

nACSC: ambulatory care sensitive admissions.

oAI: artificial intelligence.

pFFPI: false-positive per image.

qCE: cost-effectiveness.