Table 2.
Issue | Similarities | Different perspectives | Actions |
---|---|---|---|
Environments where care and treatment are delivered | Requires age-appropriate environments and programmes; to promote normality. | Which model of care is best for AYA? Is it a family-focused or an individual-focused? Should AYA cancer care be delivered near the patient's home, in a local hospital or in a regional referral centre? |
|
Multidisciplinary care | Complex age-specific psychological, financial and social needs. Challenging behaviours (e.g. smoking, substance use and sexual health). Distinct late sequelae. Fertility preservation and age-specific counselling. Transitions between services. Distinct end-of-life care needs. |
‘An MDT’ has variable definitions. Do we always include wider care services (e.g. psychologist, social worker, learning mentor) in our core MDT for all AYA? Do we proactively explore the cancer's impact on education, wider life and family for all AYA over time, or is it sufficient to react to problems that become apparent? Do we expect to transition patients to other age-appropriate services as a young person ages, e.g. late effects services, which screen for sequelae? |
|
Epidemiology | Rarity; unique spectrum of cancer types and unique biology within cancer types. | What is the right and fair amount of health service resources, e.g. staff/patient ratio required to assess and treat AYA with cancer compared with children or older adults? |
|
Pathways to care | Insufficient awareness among the general population and many health care professionals. Specific symptom interpretations and use of medical services. Complex and prolonged pathway to diagnosis and treatment. |
How much of the AYA cancer pathway should be led by age-appropriate experts and how much led by services who have their main expertise in much younger or much older people? |
|
PPIE in health care | Important that young people are given a ‘voice and a choice’, as this helps to make the services and research right for them. AYA patients can be the best advocates for AYA services, particularly to some audiences (e.g. primary care). |
Should patient engagement activities be during the usual working day or at times that can accommodate people who are in work or education? |
|
Research and trials | It is essential to accrue AYA into clinical trials and research studies. | How many AYA diagnosed with cancer should we aim to accrue into clinical trials? Is the 5%-10% seen in older adults enough to make progress or is the ≥70% seen in childhood cancer necessary to make progress? Can some aspects of clinical trial care be delivered in hospitals with less accreditation in place and still contribute data to a clinical trial, if this reduces pressure on the patient? |
|
Pharmacology | Distinct pharmacology compared with a child or older person with cancer. During the AYA years, the physiology changes quickly, e.g. under hormonal drivers. |
What should the eligible age range be for each specific clinical trial? Should it be the age range of patients that the investigators typically treat (e.g. older adults or children) or the age range of the patients with that disease? |
|
Education and training | There are specific challenges in the communication of diagnosis and prognosis, maintaining compliance and treatment adherence for AYA with cancer. | Once someone is an adult by law, what level of flexibility in health care services should be in place to enable them to adhere to cancer treatment? |
|
AYA, adolescents and young adults; ESMO, European Society for Medical Oncology; MDT, multidisciplinary team; PPIE, Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement; SIOPE, European Society for Paediatric Oncology.