Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 2.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2020 Mar 5;46(5):546–552. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1722685

Table 2.

Factor Analysis with In-home Sample in NSCAW II

AUDIT item One Factora Two Factorsa Three Factorsa
1 .30 (.09) .35 (.12) .35 (.12)
2 .58 (.34) .68 (.46) .68 (.46)
3 .70 (.50) .88 (.78) .88 (.78)
4 .84 (.71) .87 (.75) .87 (.76)
5 .86 (.73) .87 (.76) .88 (.77)
6 .85 (.72) .86 (.74) .86 (.75)
7 .87 (.77) .89 (.80) .90 (.80)
8 .82 (.68) .85 (.71) .85 (.71)
9 .54 (.29) .56 (.31) .56 (.31)
10 .83 (.69) .84 (.71) .84 (.71)

Estimated correlations among factors

1 and F2/F3 0.67

F1 and F2 0.65

F1 and F3 0.67

F2 and F3 0.99

x2 (df) 747.29 (35), p < .001 290.63 (34), p < .001 292.62 (32), p < .001
RMSEA .072, p < .001 .044, p = .99 .045, p = .94
CFI .908 .967 .966
TLI .881 .956 .952
a

Standardized estimates (item-level R2);

F1=Consumption, F2=Dependence, F3=Problems; NSCAW=National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being; AUDIT=Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; F=Factor; RMSEA=Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; df=degrees of freedom; CFI=comparative fit index; TLI=Tucker Lewis Index