Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 22;180(6):1739–1745. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03924-w

Table 2.

Prevalence of altered metabolic parameters

Patients (n = 60)
WC ≥ 90th percentile, n (%) 32 (53)
SBP ≥ 90th percentile or DBP ≥ 90th percentile, n (%) 8 (13)
HDL-C ≤ 10th percentile, n (%) 8 (13)
TC ≥ 90th percentile, n (%) 11 (18)
LDL-C ≥ 90th percentile, n (%) 7 (12)
Triglycerides ≥ 90th percentile, n (%) 7 (12)
Fasting blood glucose ≥ 90th percentile, n (%) 2 (3.3)
HOMA-IR ≥ 90th percentile and HOMA 2-IR > 1.8, n (%) 16 (27)

SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, MetS metabolic syndrome, kg kilograms, cm centimeters, BMI body mass index, WC waist circumference, WHtR waist-to-height ratio, PASI Psoriasis Area Severity Index, HPT hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, HCT hypercholesterolemia, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HDL-C high-density lipoproteins-cholesterol, TC total cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoproteins-cholesterol, HOMA-IR homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, HOMA 2-IR homeostatic model assessment 2 for insulin resistance

aComparison between children with and without MetS using χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test for the study of categorical variables and Student t test or Mann-Whitney nonparametric test for the study of quantitative variables