Skip to main content
. 2021 May 7;11:9755. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87844-1

Table 4.

Pearson correlation of LCD, LCCI and RNFL thickness.

IOP boundary LCD LCCI Comparison of correlation coefficients between LCD and LCCI
r P Value r P Value u P Value
IOP < 21 mmHg − 0.405 0.032 − 0.527 0.004 1.0372 0.2996
IOP ≥ 21 mmHg − 0.263 0.037 − 0.236 0.063 0.1910 0.8485
IOP < 25 mmHg − 0.283 0.036 − 0.362 0.007 0.5854 0.5583
IOP ≥ 25 mmHg − 0.122 0.477 − 0.243 0.153 0.8315 0.4057
IOP < 30 mmHg − 0.279 0.029 − 0.335 0.008 0.4103 0.6816
IOP ≥ 30 mmHg 0.078 0.682 − 0.165 0.382 1.6230 0.1046
IOP < 35 mmHg − 0.368 0.001 − 0.348 0.002 0.1522 0.8790
IOP ≥ 35 mmHg 0.040 0.889 − 0.263 0.343 2.0520 0.0402
Total data
Mean RNFL thickness − 0.420 0.002 − 0.449 < 0.001 0.2372 0.8125
BMO-MRW − 0.245 0.019 − 0.345 < 0.001 0.7275 0.4669

BMO-MRW = Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width; IOP = intraocular pressure; LCCI = lamina cribrosa curvature index; LCD = lamina cribrosa depth; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer.

All values < 0.05 at Pearson correlation analysis are presented in boldface.

The u value more than 1.96 (P < 0.05) was considered to be statistically significant.