Table 2.

Facilitators of MFG Implementation

	Context (Agency culture/policies, billing restrictions)	Intervention (Qualities/components of the practice itself)	Practitioner (Knowledge, priorities, personality, schedule)	Recipient (Cultural factors, interest, personality, access)
Facilitators (What has enabled this to work?)	Support of treatment team (k=2) Able to bill for group (k=2) Have access to facilities/space (k=2) Waitlist Admin assistance Trainings Culture of including family Emphasized value of MFG to families Not significant pressure to bill	Adapted the model (k=2) Cooperative model (i.e., not a top-down approach) that emphasizes enhancing connections (k=2) Recruitment of families Model is compatible with other services at clinic Overall problem-solving and solution-focused model appeals to families Multiplicity of viewpoints is aligned with clinic and what families are looking for	Trainings (k=3) Flexible schedules (e.g., evening availability; k=3) Ongoing consultation/supervision (k=2) Support from trainer Commitment to the model Following fidelity as closely as possible Trainee available to help facilitate groups Meeting/clinical review Multidisciplinary team of practitioners Knowledge of DBT, CBT, and experience with family therapy	Interested in support (k=2) Dynamics of parent/kid Enough free time Families attending open-ended family support groups already Families like coming out to help consumers Motivation to learn more about primary psychotic disorders Openness to problem-solving approach

Note. Bolded were endorsed by two or more clinics. K refers to the number of clinics.