Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD004416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004416.pub2

MacKie Child 1990.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled
Duration: 24 weeks (16 weeks' intervention, 8 weeks off treatment)
Interval of assessment: 4 weeks
Participants Number randomised: 19 (10 in the active group and 9 in the placebo group)
Sex (M/F): 10/10 total (3/7 in the active group and 7/3 in the placebo group)
Age of participants: active group = 6.2, placebo group = 5.8 (means)
Unit of allocation: whole person
Country and setting: Glasgow, UK; single dermatology centre
Inclusion criteria of the study
  • Participants of either sex

  • Participants < 12 years

  • Participants with moderate to severe atopic eczema, as defined by extensive body involvement

  • Diagnosis: severity of condition: moderate to severe eczema defined as extensive body involvement with regular need for moderately potent or potent steroid or frequent need for systemic steroids, cytotoxic therapy, combined with other measures, particularly antipruritic agents or antibiotics as required


Exclusion criteria of the study
  • Pruritis of any other cause

  • Any other inflammatory skin disorder or any systemic disorder

  • Any severe intercurrent illness, including liver failure, renal failure, malignancy

  • Participants pregnant or trying to conceive

  • Participants with epilepsy

  • Participants on phenothiazines

Interventions
  1. Treatment group: 8 capsules daily, each with 40 mg GLA and 11 mg vitamin E

  2. Placebo group: 8 capsules daily, each with 500 mg olive oil

Outcomes
  1. Participant assessment of itching (method of assessment: VAS 0 to 100; none to worst ever)

  2. Participant assessment of all other signs and symptoms of eczema except itch (method of assessment: VAS)

  3. Skin assessments by the dermatologist (method of assessment: Glasgow method and skin profilimetry)

  4. EFA levels

  5. Adverse events (mild, moderate, severe)

Notes Previous treatment not stopped
Assessment of compliance: "There were no details relating to any assessments of compliance in the protocol. All unused capsules were returned to Scotia Pharmaceuticals at the end of the study"
Concommitant treatment of the children's eczema was permitted to continue as usual
The results were evaluated ‐ by other individuals ‐ 6 years after the study completed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was computer‐generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk The trial used sealed envelopes
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk There were no withdrawals, but defaults: 4/10 in the active group and 2/9 in the placebo group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk This was low risk
Other bias High risk The results were evaluated 6 years after the completion of the study; other individuals evaluated the results. 1 child was included against protocol (age 12)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk This was adequately blinded