Table 6.
Assumptions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Optimal | Net savings relative to | |||
Life is valued | Incremental cost | lockdown | no-lockdown baseline | |
Lockdown R0 | with | of lockdown | duration | ($, billion) |
0.620 | VSL | $36.93 bil. | 3 weeks | $464.51 |
$46.16 bil. | 2 weeks | $409.20 | ||
dQALY | $36.93 bil. | 2 weeks | $76.36 | |
$46.16 bil. | 1 week | $44.53 | ||
0.775 | VSL | $36.93 bil. | 3 weeks | $401.64 |
$46.16 bil. | 2 weeks | $341.88 | ||
dQALY | $36.93 bil. | 2 weeks | $56.19 | |
$46.16 bil. | 1 week | $31.24 |
SOURCES Author’s calculations
NOTES This table is an update of Table 3 in the main text based on the assumption that IFR for each age bin is reduced by 25%. It reports the optimal lockdown duration as a function of assumptions listed in the table. The right-hand column presents the incremental net savings of a lockdown of optimal length calculated as its benefits minus the associated costs incurred over the lockdown duration