Skip to main content
. 2021 May 7;21:431. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06072-0

Table 6.

Summary of findings comparison 2

Summary of findings: Self-management interventions compared to control in adolescents living with HIV
Patient or population: Adolescents living with HIV; Setting: Low-, middle-, and high-income countries; Intervention: Self-management interventions with all 3 components; Comparison: Usual care
Outcome Follow-up Pooled effect (95%CI) No. of participants (studies) Certainty of evidence (GRADE) Comments
Confidence 6 months MD 0.80 (−0.12 to 1.72) 93 (1 trial)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW a,b,c

HIV self-management interventions compared to usual care for adolescents living with HIV may make little or no difference to confidence at 6-month follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain.
Adherence (self-reported) 6 months SMD 0.67 (0.27 to 1.07) 107 (2 trials)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW a,b,c

HIV self-management interventions compared to usual care for adolescents living with HIV may increase self-reported adherence at 6-month follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain.
Adherence (more than 95%) 9 months RR 1.14 (1.20 to 1.65) 177 (1 trial)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW a,b,c

HIV self-management interventions compared to usual care for adolescents living with HIV may increase the likelihood of achieving over 95% adherence at 9-month follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain.
Sexual risk behaviour 3 months MD −11.97 (−25.45 to 1.51) 51 (1 trial)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW a,b,c

HIV self-management interventions compared to usual care for adolescents living with HIV may make little or no difference to sexual risk behaviour at 3-month follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain.
Viral load (log 10) 3 months MD −0.66 (−1.21 to − 0.11) 51 (1 trial)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW a,b,c

HIV self-management interventions compared to usual care for adolescents living with HIV may decrease viral load at 3-month follow-up and may make little to no difference at 6-month follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain.
6 months MD −0.84 (−1.69 to 0.01) 93 (1 trial)
Depression 6 months

MD −0.60

(−2.67 to 1.47)

93

(1 trial)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW a,b,c

HIV self-management interventions compared to usual care for adolescents living with HIV may make little or no difference to depression at 6-month follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain.

CI Confidence interval, MD Mean difference, SMD Standardised mean difference, RR Risk ratio

GRADE Working Group: Grades of evidence

High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.

Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.

Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect

Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

Footnotes: Explanation of GRADE certainty of evidence

a Downgraded by 1 for serious concerns about risk of bias in at least one domain

b Downgraded by 1 for indirectness, as studies did not only include adolescents (age 10 to 19)

c Downgraded by 1 for serious concerns about imprecision with wide 95%CI intervals and small sample sizes