Skip to main content
. 2021 May 8;60(6):3931–3948. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01235-4

Table 2.

Mixed effects linear regression for congregational readiness

Model 1
B (SE)
Model 2
B (SE)
Model 3
B (SE)
Model 4
B (SE)
Main effects
Region
 Western  − .17 (.16)  − .17 (.16)  − .17 (.17)  − .17 (.16)
 Southeastern  − .17 (.14)  − .18 (.14)  − .19 (.15)  − .17 (.14)
 South Centrala
Faith Tradition
 United Methodist .19 (.18) .21 (.19) .23 (.20) .19 (.19)
 Episcopal .05 (.17) .07 (.18) .08 (.19) .05 (.18)
 Jewisha
Time Point .21 (.08)**  − .03 (.15) .05 (.13)**  − .50 (.48)
KNOWLEDGE .40 (.08)*** .60 (.13)*** .39 (.08)*** .39 (.08)***
COMMUNITY .64 (.03)*** .63 (.03)*** .70 (.05)*** .64 (.03)***
VALUE .18 (.06)** .17 (.06)** .18 (.06)** .31 (.11)**
Interaction effects
KNOWLEDGE × Time Point .34 (.17)*
COMMUNITY × Time Point .10 (.06)
VALUE × Time Point .19 (.13)
Random effects
Intercept (Congregation) .004 (.02) .004 (.02) .006 (.02) .004 (.02)

aReference groups categories are region: South Central and Faith Tradition: Jewish. | B = main effect. SE = standard error

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001