Skip to main content
. 2021 May 8;52(4):1061–1067. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02477-5

Table 3.

Tissue plasminogen activator indications for patients with presumptive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in deteriorating hypoxia and shock and types of respiratory support when receiving tPA

tPA indications, n (%) Total number of patients (n = 57)
Sole RV strain 9 (21.1%)
RV strain and RV thrombus 2 (3.5%)
RV strain and DVT 3 (5.3%)
RV strain and increased Vd 5 (8.8%)
Sole DVT on US 4 (7.0%)
Sole Increased Vd 18 (31.6%)
DVT and increased Vd 2 (3.5%)
Hypoxia and shock without clear evidence of PE 14 (24.6%)
Respiratory support at tPA, n (%)
Non-rebreather mask 0 (0%)
High flow nasal cannula 0 (0%)
Bilevel positive airway ventilation 1 (1.8%)
Invasive mechanical ventilator 56 (98.2%)
D-dimer (μg/ml), median [IQR] 10.5 [3.4–19.2]

tPA tissue plasminogen activator; RV right ventricle; FOCUS focused cardiac ultrasound; DVT deep venous thrombosis; US ultrasound; PE pulmonary embolism