Skip to main content
. 2021 May 9;226(3):152093. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2021.152093

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison of the decrease of CR1/E density at first determination among COVID-19 patients according to CR1 density genotypes. (A) Among CR1/E (low) from patients at the lowest value during longitudinal follow-up (Mean = 372 SD = 134 N = 52). HH: patients homozygous for the high density genotype (Mean = 426 SD = 122 N = 32). LH patients heterozygous for the high and low density genotypes (Mean = 308 SD = 93 N = 17). (B) CR1/E%: CR1/E were expressed as the percentage of the mean CR1/E density predicted from the genotype of a given individual. Among CR1/E (low) from patients at the lowest value during longitudinal follow-up (Mean = 60 SD = 18.3 N = 52). HH% (Mean = 57 SD = 16.3 N = 32); LH% (Mean = 66 SD = 19.9 N = 17). Means are depicted as open squares. Proportionally, patients with the HH high density genotype displayed a more important loss of CR1/E than LH heterozygous patients. Wilcoxon median test (p < 0.001).