Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;12(2):669–693. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-341

Table 7. The C-indexes of the established nomograms and other conventional staging systems.

C‐index OS RFS
Training cohort Validation cohort Training cohort Validation cohort
Nomogram 0.761 (0.734–0.788) 0.715 (0.676–0.754) 0.736 (0.710–0.762) 0.683 (0.643–0.723)
AJCC 0.710 (0.681–0.739)* 0.686 (0.646–0.726)* 0.700 (0.674–0.726)* 0.643 (0.602–0.684)*
BCLC 0.674 (0.647–0.701)* 0.643 (0.600–0.686)* 0.665 (0.640–0.690)* 0.609 (0.566–0.652)*
JIS 0.690 (0.660–0.720)* 0.684 (0.643–0.725)* 0.679 (0.654–0.704)* 0.649 (0.608–0.690)*
CNLC 0.693 (0.664–0.722)* 0.655 (0.610–0.700)* 0.673 (0.645–0.701)* 0.622 (0.582–0.662)*
CLIP 0.635 (0.606–0.664)* 0.655 (0.614–0.696)* 0.636 (0.608–0.664)* 0.641 (0.600–0.682)*
SOLMR 0.647 (0.620–0.674)* 0.593 (0.550–0.636)* 0.615 (0.589–0.641)* 0.576 (0.537–0.615)*

*, P<0.001 when compared with nomogram. AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; JIS, Japan Integrated Staging; CNLC, China Liver Cancer staging; CLIP, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program.