Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;12(2):237–248. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-374

Table 2. Comparison of oncological evaluation of radical surgery between LTG and OTG groups.

Tumor parameters LTG group (n=23) OTG group (n=46) P value
Distal margin (cm) 10.0 (8.0, 12.0) 10.0 (6.5, 12.0) 0.692
Proximal margin (cm) 2.5 (1.5, 5.0) 2.5 (1.5, 5.0) 1.000
The number of resected LNs 37.0 (23.0, 42.0) 32.0 (25.0, 38.0) 0.356
The number of metastatic LNs 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) 0.0 (0.0, 3.0) 0.469
Resected LNs of No. 1-6 25.0 (10.0, 34.0) 22.5 (16.0, 30.0) 0.914
Metastatic LNs of No. 1-6 0.0 (0.0, 1.0) 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) 0.638
Resected LNs of No. 7-9 8.0 (7.0, 11.0) 7.0 (5.0, 9.0) 0.082
Metastatic LNs of No. 7-9 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.313
Resected LNs of No. 11p, 12a 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) 0.107
Metastatic LNs of No. 11p, 12a 0.0 (0.0,0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.753

Continuous variates were presented as median (IQR) based on Mann-Whitney U test unless otherwise noted. LNs, lymph nodes; LTG, laparoscopic total gastrectomy; OTG, open total gastrectomy.