Skip to main content
. 2021 May 10;2021(5):CD013620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013620.pub2

Comparison 4. Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces compared with reactive fibre surfaces.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
4.1 Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer 3 285 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.68, 1.19]