Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2020 Jul 1;20(12):3285–3293. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16095

Table 2:

Summary of the different Cas9 variants and their roles for the improvement of this technology.

Date Cas variants Purpose Improvements Reference
2013 WT Cas9 native Cas9(spCas9) genome editing specific genome editing in eukaryotic cell 16-18
2016 e-SpCas9 increase the specificity of Cas9 mutations in non-catalytic domain and reduced off-target effects 70
2016 HF1-SpCas9 71
2017 hypa-spCas9 72
2018 xCas9 expand the PAM recognition broad range of PAM sequence and greater DNA sensitivity 73
 2015 saCas9 Cas9 alternative in other organisms smaller Cas9 with different PAM 74
2015 other major Cas molecules Cas12a(Cpf1) finding Cas9 alternative smaller Cas9, easy to pack in virus 75
2016 Cas13a(C2c2) ability to modify RNA sequence 76, 77
2018 Cas14 ability to target ss DNA 78
 
  mutated
spCas9
fused domains  
2013 Cas9n(nickease) (one mutation) - genome editing reduce the chance of random double strand cut 79
2016 Cytidine Deaminase base editing (C to T) genome editing without ds DNA cut and donor DNA 23
2017 Deoxyadenosine deaminase base editing (A to G) 80
2019 Reverse Transcriptase prime editing 24
 
2013 dCas9 (death or inactive Cas9) (double mutation) KRAB gene regulation site specific gene silencing 81
2013 VP64,VPR site specific gene activation 82, 83
2014 Fokl reduce off-target effect less off-target activities 84
2015 p300 epigenome editing site specific acetylation of H3K27 85
2016 Tet epigenome editing site specific removal of methyl group 86
2017 DNMT3a epigenome editing site specific addition of methyl group 87
2017 GFP live-cell imaging specific loci labeling in vivo 88
2017 PYL1,ABI1 reorganizing chromatin architecture locus specific chromatin looping 89
2019 EZH2 epigenome editing site specific methylation of H3K27 90