Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Apr 28;15(4):e0009284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009284

Basement membrane proteins as a substrate for efficient Trypanosoma brucei differentiation in vitro

Federico Rojas 1,*, Mathieu Cayla 1, Keith R Matthews 1
Editor: Hira L Nakhasi2
PMCID: PMC8109799  PMID: 33909626

Abstract

The ability to reproduce the developmental events of trypanosomes that occur in their mammalian host in vitro offers significant potential to assist in understanding of the underlying biology of the process. For example, the transition from bloodstream slender to bloodstream stumpy forms is a quorum-sensing response to the parasite-derived peptidase digestion products of environmental proteins. As an abundant physiological substrate in vivo, we studied the ability of a basement membrane matrix enriched gel (BME) in the culture medium to support differentiation of pleomorphic Trypanosoma brucei to stumpy forms. BME comprises extracellular matrix proteins, which are among the most abundant proteins found in connective tissues in mammals and known substrates of parasite-released peptidases. We previously showed that two of these released peptidases are involved in generating a signal that promotes slender-to-stumpy differentiation. Here, we tested the ability of basement membrane extract to enhance parasite differentiation through its provision of suitable substrates to generate the quorum sensing signal, namely oligopeptides. Our results show that when grown in the presence of BME, T. brucei pleomorphic cells arrest at the G0/1 phase of the cell cycle and express the differentiation marker PAD1, the response being restricted to differentiation-competent parasites. Further, the stumpy forms generated in BME medium are able to efficiently proceed onto the next life cycle stage in vitro, procyclic forms, when incubated with cis-aconitate, further validating the in vitro BME differentiation system. Hence, BME provides a suitable in vitro substrate able to accurately recapitulate physiological parasite differentiation without the use of experimental animals.

Author summary

African trypanosome parasites responsible for human and animal trypanosomiasis, live extracellularly in their mammalian host and exploit environmental information to regulate their virulence and transmissibility. Morphological slender forms that proliferate in the mammalian host transform into the non-proliferative stumpy forms by receiving an extracellular signal generated by the accumulating parasites. Parasites secrete peptidases into the host that degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. In this study, we evaluated the capacity to generate stumpy forms in vitro by including a basement membrane extract into the culture medium. We show that cells exposed to ECM proteins are able to differentiate efficiently into cell-cycle arrested stumpy forms and that the generated differentiation signal depends on the stumpy induction signalling pathway. This method can be used to generate stumpy forms in vitro, these being suitable for experimental analysis, thereby reducing the use of mice.

Introduction

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a composite of cell-secreted molecules that offers biochemical and structural support to cells, tissues, and organs. ECM contains laminin 1, fibronectin, vitronectin, entactin, heparin sulphate proteoglycan and type IV collagen. Collagen represents the most abundant protein found in mammals and accounts for over 90% of the total protein mass in the ECM [1]. Collagen fibres provide tensile strength to the ECM and maintain scaffolding for cell-to-cell communication. Twenty-eight different collagens containing 46 distinct polypeptide chains have been identified in vertebrates [2]. These different collagens possess a primary structural Gly-Pro-X repeat (with X often being another proline) that is responsible for their characteristic right-handed helix secondary structure [1]. A collagen molecule consists of three subunits called α chains and has a triple-helical structure. This triple helical structure resists most protease digestion except for collagenases such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Gelatin is a denatured form of collagen and collagen-derived peptides (CP) formed by protease hydrolysis.

Various di- or tripeptides are included in CP. Furthermore, it is thought that collagen in living tissues is degraded into collagen peptides by various enzymes secreted by osteoclasts or osteoblasts during the process of bone metabolism [3]. Several food-derived collagen oligopeptides have also been identified in human blood after oral ingestion of CP, reflecting their serum stability. One contributor to this stability is the presence of Prolyl-hydroxyproline (Pro-Hyp) containing peptides which are relatively resistant to hydrolysis in vivo and may play important functions in target tissues [4]. For example, it has been reported that Pro-Hyp affects the growth of fibroblasts and regulates the differentiation of chondrocytes. Additionally, Matrikines, including Pro-Hyp containing peptides, are biomolecules derived from larger ECM macromolecules such as hyaluronan, collagen, or laminin that serve as a physiological signal for cells or cellular receptors that are not activated by the full-sized parent matrix macromolecule [5].

Trypanosoma brucei spp., responsible for human and animal trypanosomiasis, live extracellularly in their mammalian host and exploit environmental information to regulate their virulence and transmissibility. Morphological slender forms that proliferate in the mammalian host transform into the non-proliferative stumpy forms by receiving an extracellular signal generated by the accumulating parasites [68]. Molecular components of this quorum sensing (QS) response mechanism have been recently characterised, showing that peptidases released by the parasite into the host are important in generating oligopeptides that trigger differentiation [9]. The identification of oligopeptides as inducers of this transformation allowed us to explore substrates found in the host which these peptidases could be acting upon in order to promote parasite development.

A study of the T. brucei secretome has revealed it to be very rich in various peptidases, covering more than 10 peptidase families or subfamilies [10]. Two trypanosome peptidases, oligopeptidase B and prolyl oligopeptidase, have been shown to be insensitive to host serum inhibitors and retain their catalytic activity in the blood of infected hosts [11, 12]. In T. cruzi, prolyl-oligopeptidase has been shown to have collagenase activity against collagens type I and IV, as well as fibronectin [13], suggesting that this enzyme may be important for degrading the extracellular matrix and allowing the parasite to penetrate host tissues, as well for cell invasion [14]. In T. brucei, prolyl oligopeptidase hydrolyzes peptide hormones containing Pro or Ala at the P1 position and also cleaves type I collagen in vitro and native collagen present in rat mesentery [15]. Metalloproteases also play an important role in the degradation of proteins that constitute the blood-brain barrier, namely collagen, fibronectin, and laminin, all of which are critical components of the vascular matrix. Consequently, Bastos et al. [15] have suggested that the extracellular release of peptidases from T. brucei could contribute to the disruption of the blood brain barrier by hydrolysis of collagen and/or peptides resulting from its partial degradation. Released parasite-derived peptidases could also perturb metabolic or endocrine homeostasis through hormonal regulation, since identified substrates of trypanosome peptidases include thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) [15, 16].

Taking into consideration that oligopeptides promote slender to stumpy differentiation and that trypanosomes release stable peptidases that can act on extracellular matrix substrates, we explored whether matrix components could support and promote parasite differentiation in vitro. Our results demonstrate that a basement membrane extract culture (BME) supplement promotes stumpy formation via the quorum sensing pathway in comparison to other media, including standard liquid broth or methylcellulose containing medium. The use of BME as a culture supplement will facilitate analysis of this developmental step in vitro and reduce the requirement for animal use in some experiments.

Methods

Trypanosomes

Trypanosoma brucei EATRO 1125 AnTat1.1 90:13 (TETR T7POL NEO HYG) [17], Trypanosoma brucei AnTat1.1 J1339 [9] or Trypanosoma brucei AnTat1.1 J1339 ZC3H20 Knock-out [18] parasites were used throughout for all pleomorphic cell analysis. For monomorphic trypanosome analysis, T. brucei Lister 427 90:13 (TETR T7POL NEO HYG) [19] cells were used. Parasites were grown in vitro in HMI-9 medium (Life technologies) [20] at 37°C 5% CO2. Antibiotic concentrations used for parasite maintenance were: Hygromycin (0.5μg/ml), puromycin (0.5μg/ml), phleomycin (1.5μg/ml), G418 (2.5μg/ml), Blasticidin (10μg/ml).

Basement Membrane Extract assays

Cultrex Basement Membrane Extract, PathClear (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD) or Geltrex (Thermo Fisher, A1569601) was added to 24-well plates (between 50–300 μl–total protein concentration ~0.6–3.6 mg) and allowed to gelify at 37°C for 30 min. Cells were diluted in 2 ml of HMI-9 and plated on top of the gelled basement membrane extract and cultured for up to 72h. Samples for PAD1 analysis by immunofluorescence were prepared after 72hrs post-inoculation. To allow extraction of cells embedded in the gel, the mixture of HMI-9 and BME was gently passed through a syringe (0.2μm) to disrupt the collagen fibers. Cells were then centrifuged at 4500g for 5 minutes and washed with cold PBS.

In vitro differentiation to procyclic forms

Parasites grown in HMI-9 with or without BME were supplemented with 6mM pH7.0 cis-aconitate (Sigma, A3412) and were incubated at 27°C. Samples were collected for immunofluorescence analysis at 0h, 3h and 6h post addition of cis-aconitate. Progression to procyclic forms was monitored by their expression of EP procyclin.

Immunofluorescence and cell cycle analysis

Paraformaldehyde-fixed cells were adhered to Polysine slides (VWR; 631–0107). 20 μl 0.1% triton in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was applied to each well for 2 min. This was then aspirated and the wells were washed with a large drop of PBS. The wells were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS for 45 min at 37°C in a humidity chamber. They were then incubated with 20 μl primary antibody (diluted in 2% BSA in PBS, αPAD1 1: 1,000), αEP procyclin 1:500 (VH Bio)) for 1.30 hour at 4°C in a humidity chamber. Positive control wells and secondary antibody-only wells were included for each experiment. The wells were each washed five times by repeatedly applying and aspirating PBS. They were next incubated with 20 μl secondary antibody (diluted in 2% BSA in PBS, α-rabbit (for PAD1) or α-mouse (for EP procyclin) Alexa fluor 488 1:500 (Life technologies)) for 45 min at 4°C in a humidity chamber. 20 μl of a DAPI working dilution (10 μg ml–1 in PBS) was then applied to each well for 1 min, followed by five washes with PBS. Slides were mounted with a cover slip by the application of Mowiol containing 2.5% diazabicyclo(2.2.2) octane DABCO and analysed on a Zeiss Axioskop 2 plus or Zeiss Axio Imager Z2. QCapture Suite Plus Software (version 3.1.3.10, https://www.qimaging.com) was used for the image capture. Images of PAD1 and DAPI staining were overlaid in ImageJ 64 and cell counts were performed using the Cell Counter plugin. Cells were considered PAD1+ when expression of this stumpy marker was expressed at the surface of parasites. Counting was not performed blindly. >250 cells were counted per sample and per time point.

Quantification and statistical

Graphical and statistical analyses were carried out in GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA, https://www.graphpad.com) by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA test followed by Tukey post-hoc analysis. Graphs provide mean values ± SEM.

Results

Evaluation of basement membrane extract containing medium for parasite growth and differentiation

Matrigel (BME) is a soluble and sterile extract of basement membrane proteins derived from the Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm tumour that forms a 3D gel at 37°C and supports mammalian cell morphogenesis, differentiation, and tumour growth [21]. The major components of BME include laminin, collagen IV, entactin, and heparin sulphate proteoglycans.

Pleomorphic T. brucei parasites (EATRO 1125, AnTat1.1 90:13)[19] were grown in vitro in the presence of BME and the effects on cell proliferation assessed with respect to growth in HMI-9 liquid trypanosome culture medium (Fig 1A). Given the possibility that increasing the viscosity of the medium could induce cells to differentiate, we also tested the ability of cells to differentiate in Geltrex, an extracellular matrix with 10 times less protein concentration than BME but with similar gelling properties, as well as HMI-9 containing agarose 0.65%(w/v) and 1.1%(w/v) methylcellulose, which have been used previously to support pleomorphic cell growth [22, 23]. Cells grew at comparable rates during the first 48 hrs but by 72 hrs parasites in the presence of BME showed a stumpy-like phenotype. BME exposed cells showed accumulation of 98.7%±0.98 of the cells in a 1K1N (1 kinetoplast 1 nucleus), 0.39%±0.07 (2K1N) and 0.9%±0.9 (2K2N) cell-cycle configuration, consistent with the cell cycle arrest observed for stumpy parasites. Meanwhile, cells cultured in HMI-9 showed 89%±3.2 in a 1K1N, 5.5% ±1.2 in a 2K1N and 5.4% ±1.9 in a 2K2N configuration. These results show that including BME in the culture environment promotes cell cycle arrest of T. brucei cells in vitro (Fig 1, right panel). We then assayed levels of PAD1 expression, a stumpy cell enriched surface marker protein. Parasites grown in the presence of BME showed a significantly higher level of cells expressing PAD1 at 72hrs (75.2% ±1.9, p<0.0001), whereas in HMI-9 only 11.6% ± 0.5 of cells exhibited expression of PAD1 at the same time-point. In contrast, culture in the presence of either agarose at 0.65% (w/v) or in 1.1% (w/v) methylcellulose generated much lower levels of PAD1-expressing cells than with BME (14.6% ±2.0 and 17.7% ±1.7, respectively). Moreover, Geltrex did not increase the proportion of differentiated cells (14.0% ±1.8 PAD1+), indicating that the higher concentration of the protein substrate present in BME matrigel is necessary to generate the differentiation signal (Fig 1B).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

(A) Growth of pleomorphic T. brucei AnTat1.1 90:13 in the presence of different support media. MC: methylcellulose; BME or HMI-9 as a control. n = 2 per group. The right-hand panel shows the proportion of cells with 1 kinetoplast and 1 nucleus (1K1N, G1 and S phase cells), 2 kinetoplasts and 1 nucleus (2K1N, G2 phase cells) or 2 kinetoplasts and 2 nuclei (2K2N, post mitotic cells) from an analysis of 250 cells per condition at 72hs. (B) Expression of the stumpy marker PAD1 in the presence of different support media. (****P < 0.0001, one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). The right-hand panel shows representative images of PAD1 (green) expressing cells at different BME concentrations. >400 cells were counted for each condition. The parasite nucleus and kinetoplast (stained with DAPI) is pseudocoloured in blue. Scale bars, 10 μm.

To analyse the effect of providing different concentrations of BME to the culture media, we tested three different volumes of BME added to the 24-well plates (50, 150 and 300 μl of BME in 2 ml HMI-9) (Fig 2A). Commercial BME has a protein concentration that ranges from 12–18 mg/ml, thus in our experiment parasites were provided with ~0.6–0.9, 1.2–1.8 or 2.4–3.6 mg (in 2ml HMI-9), respectively. Increasing the concentration of BME in the media resulted in a concomitant increase in PAD1 expression (22.5%±3.2 for 50 μl, 63.5%±6.8 for 150 μl, 76.5%±4.6 for 300μl–HMI-9 22.6%±3.5), confirming that matrigel provides the necessary substrates for the generation of stumpy forms in a concentration-dependent manner.

Fig 2. Expression of the PAD1 marker is dependent on BME concentration.

Fig 2

(A)T. brucei AnTat1.1 90:13 cells were grown in the presence of increasing concentrations of BME and samples were taken at 72 hrs. Increasing the concentration of substrates leads to a higher percentage of cells expressing the stumpy marker PAD1. 200 cells counted per condition (****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.0002, n.s: not significant; one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). The right-hand panel shows representative immunofluorescence images for cells cultured in the presence of different concentrations of BME with PAD1 pseudo-coloured in green and DAPI (nucleus and kinetoplast) in blue. Scale bars, 10 μm. (B) Expression of EP procyclin after incubation with either HMI-9 alone or BME for 72 hrs and exposure to 6mM cis-aconitate for 0, 3 or 6 hrs from the analysis of >250 cells per condition. The stumpy form parasites obtained in BME express the EP procyclin protein to a higher level than cells isolated from HMI9. Procyclic form cells (PCF) are included as a positive control. Error bars = S.E.M. (****P < 0.0001; one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). The right-hand panel shows representative immunofluorescence images of EP+ cells (in green) after exposure to cis-aconitate. The parasite nucleus and kinetoplast (stained with DAPI) is pseudo-colored in blue. Scale bars, 10 μm.

Stumpy forms generated in basement membrane extract medium differentiate effectively to procyclic forms

We next assessed the capacity of the stumpy forms generated in BME to differentiate to tsetse midgut-like procyclic forms. After 72hrs incubation in BME, cells were exposed to 6 mM cis-aconitate, a trigger for onward differentiation [24, 25]. 34.1%±0.95 of cells expressed EP procyclin after 3 hr and 78.2% ±1.96 by 6 hr post exposure to cis-aconitate (Fig 2B). This was in contrast to the same pleomorphic cells grown in HMI-9 alone and exposed to cis-aconitate (11%±2.6 at 3 hours and 9.4%±2.5 -EP positive cells at 6 hours post-addition). These results show that the stumpy forms generated by the incubation in the presence of BME are capable of differentiating into the next life-cycle form.

Basement membrane extract promotes parasite differentiation through the QS- signalling pathway

To confirm that the effect on pleomorphic cells was due to the generation of the differentiation signal, T. brucei Lister 427 90:13 monomorphic cells [19], which have lost the capacity for stumpy formation through serial passage in vitro, were also incubated in the presence of BME (Fig 3A). Unlike pleomorphic cells, monomorphic cells in BME did not express the stumpy marker PAD1 and grew to similar levels as cells in HMI-9 alone.

Fig 3. BME induces differentiation through the SIF pathway.

Fig 3

(A) Growth of monomorphic T. brucei 427 vs pleomorphic T. brucei AnTat1.1 90:13 in the presence of BME. The middle panel shows the expression of the stumpy marker PAD1 in the presence BME for monomorphic and pleomorphic cells (>500 cells were counted per condition). Error bars = S.E.M. (****P < 0.0001; *P = 0.0169, one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). The right-hand panel shows representative immunofluorescence images of PAD1+ cells (in green) for monomorphs (427) and pleomorphs (Pleo) cells. Nucleus and kinetoplast (stained with DAPI) are pseudo-colored in blue. Scale bars, 10 μm. (B) Growth of a null mutant line for the stumpy formation signalling pathway component ZC3H20 vs wild type (WT) pleomorphic T. brucei AnTat1.1 90:13 in the presence of BME. Unlike WT cells, ZC3H20 KO cells do not express the PAD1 protein as these cells have the stumpy formation signalling pathway disrupted (middle panel). >200 cells counted per condition. ****P < 0.0001, one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. The right-hand panel shows representative immunofluorescence images of PAD1+ cells (in green) for T. brucei AnTAT 1.1 90–13 cell (WT) and ZC3H20 null mutant (ZC3H20) cells. The parasite nucleus and kinetoplast (stained with DAPI) are pseudo-coloured in blue and kinetoplast (stained with DAPI) are pseudo-coloured in blue. Scale bars, 10 μm.

The physiological stumpy formation signalling-pathway has been recently characterized in molecular terms [26]. To establish whether the differentiation response was enacted through this pathway in the presence of BME, null mutant cell lines for one of the genes required for quorum sensing signalling were incubated in BME-containing media. TbZC3H20 is a predicted RNA regulator and a proposed substrate for the TbDYRK kinase [18, 27, 28]. Null mutants of TbZC3H20 are insensitive to the QS signal in vitro and fail to differentiate efficiently into the stumpy forms in vivo. When analysed in BME containing medium, the growth of TbZCH20 null mutants was equivalent to the same cells grown in HMI-9 alone. However, PAD1 expression was significantly lower in the null mutant cell line compared to the parental cell line (Fig 3B). This result indicates that the signal generated by incubating cells in BME is acting through the physiological QS pathway, inducing PAD1 expression, cell cycle arrest and parasite differentiation.

Discussion

Our results show that basement membrane extract can provide suitable substrates for the signal that fuels quorum sensing-mediated cell differentiation in Trypanosoma brucei. This is consistent with our previous results where we describe the signal generator (peptidases), the signal (oligopeptides) and the transporter (TbGPR89) involved in the trypanosome’s density-sensing mechanism. Importantly, we were able to replicate this developmental process, that normally occurs in the mammalian bloodstream and tissues, in culture conditions by including BME collagen/laminin in the media. Furthermore, the specificity of this substrate in inducing differentiation in vitro was demonstrated using developmentally incompetent monomorphic parasites unable to either reduce growth or express a stumpy-specific marker protein, PAD1. The operation of the signal through the physiological quorum sensing signalling pathway was also confirmed by the analysis of a null mutant cell line for the key developmental regulator TbZCH20, a substrate of a known signalling kinase that controls the developmental programme, TbDYRK. These parasites were unable to differentiate in response of the BME, matching their differentiation defect when analysed in vivo. Hence, BME medium induced the known characteristics of stumpy development (growth arrest, accumulation in 1K1N (G0/G1), PAD1 expression) acting through the characterised developmental pathway that functions in vivo.

Several short peptide sequences derived from ECM proteins have been used to induce mammalian cell differentiation in culture. For example, the laminin-derived Ile-Lys-Val-Ala-Val (IKVAV) and Tyr-Ile-Gly-Ser-Arg (YIGSR), as well as the fibronectin-derived Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD), are the most commonly used sequences to promote neural cell adhesion, migration and differentiation in vitro [29]. Also, collagen-derived dipeptides containing Pro-Hyp (proline-hydroxyproline) promote osteoblastic MC3T3 cell differentiation through upregulation of osteogenic Foxg1 expression [30]. It is possible that in the induction of parasite differentiation, oligopeptides generated by the incubation with collagen/lamin are imported and bind receptor proteins inside the cytosol of T. brucei, inducing a cascade of events leading to cell cycle arrest and metabolic changes. This awaits exploration.

Some peptides are frequently degraded within a short time by serum peptidases in vivo. Hydroxyproline-containing peptides are far more stable in the body, given that enzymatic systems able to hydrolyse the corresponding peptide bonds occur rarely [31]. The stability of these oligopeptides in blood makes it plausible for them to act as a differentiation signal and reach systematically beyond the vicinity where the parasite peptidases are released. Alternatively, other protein degradation products could provide the physiological signal locally or systemically and, indeed, we have already demonstrated that there is specificity to the oligopeptide signals that promote differentiation such that some may be able to signal more effectively than others [9]. Hence, the combination of sensitivity to particular oligopeptides and their specific stability may contribute to a complex signal threshold dependent upon the precise combination of different oligopeptides and their local concentration and turnover.

Previous studies show that trypanosomatids have a close interaction with collagen and other proteins that form part of the ECM [32], bringing the secreted peptidases and their substrates into close proximity. Interestingly, it has been shown that T. cruzi trypomastigotes exhibit extensive proteome remodelling when incubated with ECM (Geltrex)[33]. In that case, ECM triggers a reduction in the glycolytic enzyme activity (hexokinase/glucokinase and pyruvate kinase) and a reprogramming of the trypomastigote metabolism. Similarly, when T. brucei differentiates into stumpy forms, a shift of the metabolism toward acetate formation occurs [34]. Thus, in a mammalian infection, given the abundance of collagen/laminin in tissues, it is likely that peptidases released by infecting T. brucei can generate dipeptides/tripeptide signals that act as a proxy for the increasing parasitaemia in the host. This mechanism would limit the increase in number of replicating parasites and so prevent killing of the infected host.

To summarise, we have extended and corroborated our previous results that oligopeptides promote QS signalling, and demonstrated that these oligopeptides can originate from ECM proteins. In addition, we demonstrate that ECM extract can be used to generate stumpy forms in vitro via the physiological QS sensing pathway, with these being suitable for experimental analysis. For example, this approach could be used to rapidly evaluate pleomorphic RNA interference or null mutant cell lines for developmental defects before they are validated using an in vivo model. Growth in BME medium can also be used to study the efficient differentiation process from stumpy forms to procyclic forms without the need to obtain stumpy forms from mice, contributing to methods that enable complete recapitulation of the trypanosome life cycle in vitro and reducing animal usage in functional studies of trypanosome development. The use of a complex yet consistent extracellular matrix substrate will also facilitate the characterisation of the peptidase and oligopeptide signals that promote differentiation in African trypanosomes. This provides a more defined and reproducible model for proteomic or metabolomic studies where parasites are maintained in a more physiological condition than HMI-9 liquid broth or other media.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

Funding support was received from Wellcome Trust (https://wellcome.ac.uk) grant 103740/Z/14/Z (KM, MC, FR). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.McKee TJ, Perlman G, Morris M, Komarova SV. Extracellular matrix composition of connective tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):10542. Epub 2019/07/25. 10.1038/s41598-019-46896-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:929–58. Epub 2009/04/07. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.032207.120833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kimira Y, Ogura K, Taniuchi Y, Kataoka A, Inoue N, Sugihara F, et al. Collagen-derived dipeptide prolyl-hydroxyproline promotes differentiation of MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;453(3):498–501. Epub 2014/10/07. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.09.121 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ichikawa S, Morifuji M, Ohara H, Matsumoto H, Takeuchi Y, Sato K. Hydroxyproline-containing dipeptides and tripeptides quantified at high concentration in human blood after oral administration of gelatin hydrolysate. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2010;61(1):52–60. Epub 2009/12/08. 10.3109/09637480903257711 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gaggar A, Weathington N. Bioactive extracellular matrix fragments in lung health and disease. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(9):3176–84. Epub 2016/09/02. 10.1172/JCI83147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vassella E, Reuner B, Yutzy B, Boshart M. Differentiation of African trypanosomes is controlled by a density sensing mechanism which signals cell cycle arrest via the cAMP pathway. Journal of cell science. 1997;110 (Pt 21):2661–71. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reuner B, Vassella E, Yutzy B, Boshart M. Cell density triggers slender to stumpy differentiation of Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms in culture. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 1997;90(1):269–80. 10.1016/s0166-6851(97)00160-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Macgregor P, Savill NJ, Hall D, Matthews KR. Transmission Stages Dominate Trypanosome Within-Host Dynamics during Chronic Infections. Cell host & microbe. 2011;9(4):310–8. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.03.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rojas F, Silvester E, Young J, Milne R, Tettey M, Houston DR, et al. Oligopeptide Signaling through TbGPR89 Drives Trypanosome Quorum Sensing. Cell. 2019;176(1–2):306–17 e16. Epub 2018/12/07. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bossard G, Cuny G, Geiger A. Secreted proteases of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense: possible targets for sleeping sickness control? Biofactors. 2013;39(4):407–14. Epub 2013/04/05. 10.1002/biof.1100 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morty RE, Lonsdale-Eccles JD, Mentele R, Auerswald EA, Coetzer THT. Trypanosome-Derived Oligopeptidase B Is Released into the Plasma of Infected Rodents, Where It Persists and Retains Full Catalytic Activity. Infection and Immunity. 2001;69(4):2757–61. 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2757-2761.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bastos IMD, Motta FvN, Charneau Sb, Santana JM, Dubost L, Augustyns K, et al. Prolyl oligopeptidase of Trypanosoma brucei hydrolyzes native collagen, peptide hormones and is active in the plasma of infected mice. Microbes and Infection. 2010;12(6):457–66. 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.02.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Santana JM, Grellier P, Schrevel J, Teixeira AR. A Trypanosoma cruzi-secreted 80 kDa proteinase with specificity for human collagen types I and IV. Biochem J. 1997;325 (Pt 1):129–37. Epub 1997/07/01. 10.1042/bj3250129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alvarez VE, Iribarren PA, Niemirowicz GT, Cazzulo JJ. Update on relevant trypanosome peptidases: Validated targets and future challenges. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2021;1869(2):140577. Epub 2020/12/04. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2020.140577 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bastos IM, Motta FN, Charneau S, Santana JM, Dubost L, Augustyns K, et al. Prolyl oligopeptidase of Trypanosoma brucei hydrolyzes native collagen, peptide hormones and is active in the plasma of infected mice. Microbes Infect. 2010;12(6):457–66. Epub 2010/03/02. 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.02.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Morty RE, Bulau P, Pellé R, Wilk S, Abe K. Pyroglutamyl peptidase type I from Trypanosoma brucei: a new virulence factor from African trypanosomes that de-blocks regulatory peptides in the plasma of infected hosts. The Biochemical journal. 2006;394(Pt 3):635–45. 10.1042/BJ20051593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Engstler M. and Boshart M. Cold shock and regulation of surface protein trafficking convey sensitization to inducers of stage differentiation in Trypanosoma brucei. Genes & development. 2004;18(22):2798–811. 10.1101/gad.323404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cayla M, McDonald L, MacGregor P, Matthews K. An atypical DYRK kinase connects quorum-sensing with posttranscriptional gene regulation in Trypanosoma brucei. Elife. 2020;9. Epub 2020/03/28. 10.7554/eLife.51620 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.A tightly regulated inducible expression system for conditional gene knock-outs and dominant-negative genetics in Trypanosoma brucei, (1999). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Hirumi H, Hirumi K. Continuous cultivation of Trypanosoma brucei blood stream forms in a medium containing a low concentration of serum protein without feeder cell layers. J Parasitol. 1989;75(6):985–9. Epub 1989/12/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kleinman HK, Martin GR. Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15(5):378–86. Epub 2005/06/25. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.05.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vassella E, Boshart M. High molecular mass agarose matrix supports growth of bloodstream forms of pleomorphic Trypanosoma brucei strains in axenic culture. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1996;82(1):91–105. Epub 1996/11/12. 10.1016/0166-6851(96)02727-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bachmaier S, Thanner T, Boshart M. Culturing and Transfection of Pleomorphic Trypanosoma brucei. In: Michels PAM, Ginger ML, Zilberstein D, editors. Trypanosomatids: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer US; 2020. p. 23–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ziegelbauer K, Quinten M, Schwarz H, Pearson TW, Overath P. Synchronous differentiation of Trypanosoma brucei from bloodstream to procyclic forms in vitro. Eur J Biochem. 1990;192(2):373–8. Epub 1990/09/11. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19237.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Domingo-Sananes MR, Szoor B, Ferguson MA, Urbaniak MD, Matthews KR. Molecular control of irreversible bistability during trypanosome developmental commitment. J Cell Biol. 2015;211(2):455–68. Epub 2015/10/21. 10.1083/jcb.201506114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mony BM, MacGregor P, Ivens A, Rojas F, Cowton A, Young J, et al. Genome-wide dissection of the quorum sensing signalling pathway in Trypanosoma brucei. Nature. 2014;505(7485):681–5. 10.1038/nature12864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu B, Kamanyi Marucha K, Clayton C. The zinc finger proteins ZC3H20 and ZC3H21 stabilise mRNAs encoding membrane proteins and mitochondrial proteins in insect-form Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Microbiol. 2020;113(2):430–51. Epub 2019/11/20. 10.1111/mmi.14429 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ling AS, Trotter JR, Hendriks EF. A zinc finger protein, TbZC3H20, stabilizes two developmentally regulated mRNAs in trypanosomes. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(23):20152–62. Epub 2011/04/07. 10.1074/jbc.M110.139261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sever M, Gunay G, Guler MO, Tekinay AB. Tenascin-C derived signaling induces neuronal differentiation in a three-dimensional peptide nanofiber gel. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(7):1859–68. Epub 2018/05/26. 10.1039/c7bm00850c . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kimira Y, Odaira H, Nomura K, Taniuchi Y, Inoue N, Nakatani S, et al. Collagen-derived dipeptide prolyl-hydroxyproline promotes osteogenic differentiation through Foxg1. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2017;22:27. Epub 2017/12/08. 10.1186/s11658-017-0060-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shigemura Y, Akaba S, Kawashima E, Park EY, Nakamura Y, Sato K. Identification of a novel food-derived collagen peptide, hydroxyprolyl-glycine, in human peripheral blood by pre-column derivatisation with phenyl isothiocyanate. Food Chem. 2011;129(3):1019–24. Epub 2011/12/01. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.066 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Caljon G, Van Reet N, De Trez C, Vermeersch M, Perez-Morga D, Van Den Abbeele J. The Dermis as a Delivery Site of Trypanosoma brucei for Tsetse Flies. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(7):e1005744. Epub 2016/07/22. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mattos EC, Canuto G, Manchola NC, Magalhaes RDM, Crozier TWM, Lamont DJ, et al. Reprogramming of Trypanosoma cruzi metabolism triggered by parasite interaction with the host cell extracellular matrix. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(2):e0007103. Epub 2019/02/07. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.van Grinsven KW, Van Den Abbeele J, Van den Bossche P, van Hellemond JJ, Tielens AG. Adaptations in the glucose metabolism of procyclic Trypanosoma brucei isolates from tsetse flies and during differentiation of bloodstream forms. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8(8):1307–11. Epub 2009/06/23. 10.1128/EC.00091-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009284.r001

Decision Letter 0

Hira L Nakhasi, Paula MacGregor

22 Mar 2021

Dear Dr Rojas,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Basement membrane proteins as a substrate for efficient Trypanosoma brucei differentiation in vitro" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Both Reviewers have raised significant questions and need to be responded.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Hira L Nakhasi

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paula MacGregor

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Both Reviewers have raised significant questions and need to be responded.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript the authors have set out to develop a robust in vitro system to support Trypanosoma brucei differentiation from slender to stumpy and then onto procyclic forms. The methodology of this paper is appropriate to address the objectives of this study. Moreover, this will be an incredible useful approach for the dissection of this differentiation process.

Reviewer #2: The study is well carried out and the statistically analyses and N numbers clearly explained.

The PAD1 and EP pos/neg counting is done by microscopy scoring which is susceptible to bias. The authors should indicate whether the counting was done blinded or give more details on their criteria regarding thresholding etc.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The results are are clearly presented in the figures.

Reviewer #2: The authors use tried and tested methods to determine the effect of BME upon slender-stumpy differentiation in culture. The results are unambiguous, well presented and support their conclusions. The dose response experiments (Figure 2A) are especially compelling.

The authors should extend this to determine whether increases in stumpy form differentiation efficiency levels out above a threshold BME concentration.

Can the authors comment on why the pleomorphic cells have similarly retarded growth in BME and methylcellulose and geltrex, but BME supports far higher PAD1 pos cells and cell cycle arrest? (Figure 1)

Figures:

Figure 1: growth curve should be log scale (and others throughout the manuscript)

Figure 2: a 0hrs timepoint should be included

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Overall, the data in the paper supports the conclusion and the graphs and images are clear and well presented. The authors are able to show that the addition of BME to the media supports differentiation of pleomorphic trypanosomes through the quorum-sensing pathway.

Reviewer #2: The authors’ conclusions are supported by the data – i.e. BME supports development of stumpy forms better than other media additives and it is likely to be a good method for studying differentiation in trypanosomes.

A discussion on whether this system is likely to allow in vitro investigation into quorum sensing in related African trypanosomes would be worthwhile.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: I only have a few minor comments -

1) Can the authors provide the number of cells counted and the replicates performed for each experiment in the figure legend – some of this information is in the methods but not all and I find it simpler if this is included with the figures.

2) How were the growth analyses performed – can the authors add detail. Are these cumulative growth curves? Were the cells split each day?

3) The balance of the paper seems odd there are only 5 pages of results which includes the figure legends yet there is also 5 pages of discussion – this seems excessive. In the discussion there is lots of detail about collagen (as there was in the introduction) and various peptides that can form and their half-lives etc. I feel this though interesting would be more appropriate for a review of this topic rather than as a discussion of this paper, which is essentially a technology development paper. I would recommend that the authors reduce the length of the discussion to give it greater focus.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: This study demonstrates that BME can act as a media supplement that can support the efficient differentiation from slender to stumpy forms in pleomorphic Trypanosoma brucei. The authors use various assays (cell cycle arrest, stumpy molecular markers and lifecycle progression) to show this successfully.

This is a useful methods paper that will facilitate / promote the study of slender-stumpy form differentiation by providing a superior in vitro culture system. The advantages of such as system are two-fold: 1) This system has the potential to be far more tractable than in vivo infection. 2) this will reduce the number of mice that must be sacrificed.

This will be of interest to those studying trypanosome differentiation.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009284.r003

Decision Letter 1

Hira L Nakhasi, Paula MacGregor

16 Apr 2021

Dear Dr Rojas,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Basement membrane proteins as a substrate for efficient Trypanosoma brucei differentiation in vitro' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Hira L Nakhasi

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paula MacGregor

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009284.r004

Acceptance letter

Hira L Nakhasi, Paula MacGregor

23 Apr 2021

Dear Dr Rojas,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Basement membrane proteins as a substrate for efficient Trypanosoma brucei differentiation in vitro," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers Rojas et al.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES