Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;2(2):100116. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100116

Table 2.

Current progress in vaccine development

Strategy Developer Protective effect Cross-protection effect
Inactivated virus (PiCoVacc) Sinovac, with National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention a protective effect of 67% in Chile (real-world data) slightly reduced effectiveness against B.1.1.7 spike-expressing recombinant virus and 3.3-fold reduction against B.1.351 spike-expressing recombinant virus (in vitro)
Inactivated virus Wuhan Institute of Biological Products, Sinopharm, with Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences the positive conversion rate of neutralizing antibody was 99.06%, and the protective effect was 72.51%
Inactivated virus (BBIBP-CorV) Beijing Institute of Biological Products, Sinopharm, with Institute of Viral Disease Control and Prevention the positive conversion rate of neutralizing antibody was 99.52%, and the protective effect was 79.34% roughly equivalent against B.1.1.7 spike-expressing recombinant virus, but 2.5-fold lower efficacy against virus expressing the B.1.351 spike (in vitro)
Virus vector (Ad5) CanSino Biological Inc. with Beijing Institute of Biotechnology a protective efficacy against all symptoms of 68.83% (phase III clinical trial)
Virus vector (ChAdOx1) University of Oxford, with AstraZeneca the protective effect was 76% (phase III clinical trial), although some thrombotic events occurred; no definitive causal relationship between vaccine and thrombosis was found
LNP-mRNA (mRNA-1273) Moderna, with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 94.1% effective in phase III trial (95% CI: 89.3–96.8) roughly equivalent against B.1.1.7 spike-expressing recombinant viruses, but 6.4-fold lower against B.1.351 spike-expressing virus
LNP-mRNA (BNT162b2) BioNTech, with Fosun Pharma and Pfizer 95% in a clinical trial involving ~44,000 participants; the effective rate for preventing severe illness is 100% roughly equivalent against P.1 spike- and B.1.1.7 spike-expressing recombinant viruses, but ~2/3 reduction in efficacy against B.1.351 spike-expressing virus (in vitro study)
Protein subunit (NVX-CoV2733) Novavax 95.6% against the original strain (phase III trial in the UK) 85.6% effective against the B.1.1.7 variant (phase III trial in the UK); the protective efficacy was 60% (95% CI: 19.9–80.1) with 93% of cases involving the B.1.351 variant (phase II trial in South Africa)
Virus-vectored (Ad26) Janssen Pharmaceutical Company 66.9% effective (95% CI: 59.0–73.4)
Protein subunit (ZF2001) Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical, with Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences the positive conversion rate was 96.6% in the phase II clinical trial, and the neutralizing antibody titer was 102.5 geometric mean titer was 106.1 (95% CI: 75.0–150.1) against the original virus strain and 66.6 (95% CI: 51.0–86.9) against the B.1.351 variant