Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 29;2021:5529256. doi: 10.1155/2021/5529256

Table 2.

Level of evidence for the association of G6PD deficiency with CVD.

Study Patients (n) Effect and proposed mechanism Association# Evidence Reference
Long et al. (1967) 1,465 G6PD protective for CVD. OR 0.41 (95% CI 0.24–0.70) “statin-like” effect Weak Level 3 [7]
Cocco et al. (1998) 1,756 G6PD protective for ischemic heart disease. SMR 0.28 (0.10–0.62)
Impaired NO metabolism
Moderate Level 3 [8]
Pinna et al. (2007) 1,344 G6PD protective for retinal vein occlusion. OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.24–0.64)
“Statin-like” effect
Moderate Level 3 [98].
Pinna et al. (2008) 420 G6PD protective for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. OR 0.40 (95% CI 0.17–0.94) “statin-like” effect and impaired NO metabolism Weak Level 3 [99]
Meloni et al. (2008) 738 G6PD protective. OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.38–0.89)
“Statin-like” effect and reduced ROS production by NADPH oxidase downregulation
Moderate Level 2 [10]
Seyedian et al. (2016) 1484 G6PD protective for coronary artery disease. OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.56-1.35). “Statin-like effect” Weak Level 2 [102]
Thomas et al. (2018) 17,338 G6PD detrimental. OR 1.39 (95% CI 1.04–1.87). Impaired glutathione and NO metabolism Strong Level 2 [15]
Pes et al. (2019) 9,604 G6PD detrimental. OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.17–2.49). Multiple mechanisms including impaired inflammation, glutathione, and NO metabolism Moderate Level 2 [17]
Ou et al. (2020) 1,251 G6PD detrimental. OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.09–2.17)
Impaired vascular redox state
Strong Level 3 [18]

#The strength of association was reported based on effect size (OR, HR, frequency, P value and so on). The level of evidence was ranked according to Hadorn [180] in descending order: (level 1) meta-analyses of randomized studies, (level 2) a single study, (level 3) nonrandomized studies, (level 4) retrospective studies, and (level 5) a series of cases without controls.