Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;29(5):760–770. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00796-4

Table 2.

Overview of different sequencing techniques for polycystic kidney disease diagnosis.

Long-range PCR, Sanger sequencing and MLPA of PKD1 and PKD2 Custom capture next-generation sequencing of PKD gene-panel Whole genome sequencing with analysis targeted to PKD gene-panel
Requires extensive laboratory preparation specific to PKD testing Requires laboratory preparation specific to PKD testing Able to ‘batch’ specimens with other disease-groups undergoing the same sequencing pathway
Specific to only targeted genes Specific to only targeted genes Analysis can be expanded to entire genome, with consent
Technical expertize required for long-range PCR and potential for amplification bias Custom capture probes require redesigning when gene-panel requires updating Flexibility to vary gene panel based on patient phenotype
Requires MLPA for detecting copy number variants and challenging to detect structural variants Less robust for detecting copy number variants and challenging to detect structural variants Able to detect both copy number and structural variants within same diagnostic test
Limited data storage challenges Reduced data quantity reduces analysis and storage costs Large data quantity increases analysis and storage costs
Able to detect some mosaicism of single nucleotide variants Improved detection of low-frequency mosaic single nucleotide variants Reduced coverage makes detection of mosaicism less robust

MLPA Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification.