Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;124(10):1690–1698. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01305-0

Table 1.

Clinicopathological characteristics for patients within the population-based patient cohort applied for IHC assessment compared to the primary investigation cohort and the validation cohort (TCGA).

Variable Cohorts, n (%)
Population based (n = 444)a Primary investigation (n = 79)b P valuec Validation (TCGA) (n = 304)c P valued
Age at diagnosis (median) 0.14 0.03
 <44 213 (48) 45 (57) 121 (39)
 ≥44 231 (52) 34 (43) 183 (60)
FIGO-09 stage 0.03 <0.001
 I 322 (73) 67 (84) 161 (54)
 II–IV 122 (27) 13 (16) 136 (46)
Histologic subtype 0.17 <0.001
 SCC 318 (72) 49 (61) 253 (83)
 AC 91 (20) 22 (28) 45 (15)
 Other histology 35 (8) 9 (11) 6 (2)
Metastatic lymph node 0.28
 No 250 (69) 57 (79)
 Yes 46 (31) 15 (21)

IHC immunohistochemistry, FIGO The Féderation Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obstétrique, TCGA The Cancer Genome Atlas, SCC squamous cell carcinoma, AC adenocarcinoma.

Statistically significant p < 0.05 values are in bold.

aMissing data in population-based cohort: metastatic lymph node = 148.

bMissing data primary investigation cohort: age, n = 1 and metastatic lymph node, n = 8.

cMissing data in validation (TCGA) cohort: FIGO, n = 7. Metastatic lymph node status was not available.

dPearson’s χ2 test.