Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 21;59(2):e02455-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02455-20

TABLE 2.

Shigella isolates used for validation in this study

Serotype/species No. isolates tested (no. of correct S. flexneri
serotype identifications, %)
S. flexneri 2a 84 (84, 100)
S. flexneri 3a 21 (18, 86)a
S. flexneri 6 15 (15, 100)
S. flexneri 1a 3 (1, 33)b
S. flexneri 1b 15 (15, 100)
S. flexneri 2b 10 (10, 100)
S. flexneri 3b 1 (1, 100)
S. flexneri 4a 7 (7, 100)
S. flexneri 4b 1 (1, 100)
S. flexneri 5a 3 (3, 100)
S. flexneri 5b 1 (1, 100)
S. flexneri 7a 3 (3, 100)
S. sonnei 86 (0)
S. boydii 17 (0)
S. dysenteriae 16 (0)
Total 283 (159/164, 97)
a

The 3 discordant samples were identified as serotype 5b (oac, gtrX, and gtrV) instead of 3a (oac and gtrX only).

b

The 2 discordant samples were identified as serotype 7a (gtrI and gtrIc) instead of 1a (gtrI only).