Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;2021(5):CD011922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011922.pub4

Summary of findings 3. Lamotrigine compared with phenobarbital for the treatment of epilepsy in people with Alzheimer's disease.

Lamotrigine compared with phenobarbitalfor the treatment of epilepsy in people with Alzheimer's disease
Patient or population: patients with AD and epileptic seizures
Settings: the community of Caltanissetta, Italy
Intervention: lamotrigine
Comparison: phenobarbital
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI) No of Participants
(studies) Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Phenobarbital Lamotrigine
Proportion with seizure freedom 286 per 1000 241 per 1000
(100 to 578) RR 0.84 (0.35 to 2.02) 57
(1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low¹ RR less than 1 favours phenobarbital
Proportion with adverse events 357 per 1000 241 per 1000
(107 to 546) RR 0.68 (0.30 to 1.53) 57
(1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low¹ RR less than 1 favours lamotrigine
Reduction in seizure frequency of 50% or more 643 per 1000 586 per 1000
(386 to 887) RR 0.91 (0.60 to 1.38) 57
(1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low¹ RR less than 1 favours phenobarbital
Proportion with seizure freedom in dominantly inherited AD Not reported Not reported        
Change in cognition See comment See comment   57
(1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low¹ In the phenobarbital group, significant worsening of cognitive performance was found, with lower mean scores indicating aggravation of existing cognitive impairment at both 6 and 12 months post‐randomization on MMSE and ADAS‐Cog. In the lamotrigine group, participants showed slight declines in MMSE and ADAS‐Cog scores.
Change in neuropsychiatric symptoms See comment See comment   57
(1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low¹ In the phenobarbital group, mood score worsened by 1.74 points. In the lamotrigine group, score change of −0.72 was recorded on the Cornell scale.
Improvement in quality of life Not reported Not reported        
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes.² The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
AD: Alzheimer's disease; ADAS‐Cog: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale‐Cognitive; CI: confidence interval; MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination; RR: risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate certainty: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low certainty: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low certainty: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

¹ Only one trial was included, with 57 randomized participants and potential methodological insufficiency.

² Assumed risk is calculated as the event rate in the control group per 1000 people (number of events divided by the number of participants receiving control treatment).