Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 30;12:20406207211007058. doi: 10.1177/20406207211007058

Table 1.

Question types and consensus thresholds used in questionnaires.

Question type Definition Example questions Consensus threshold Agreement threshold for rephrasing the question Agreement threshold for restating the question
6-Point Likert scale Assessing agreement through options from ‘1’ (strongly disagree) to ‘6’ (strongly agree).22 Agreement was defined as a participant choosing options ‘5’ or ‘6’ whilst disagreement was defined as a choice of ‘1’ or ‘2’. 6-Point scales were used to ensure participants indicated a preference towards either agreement or disagreement17 ‘Joint health should be regularly measured in routine comprehensive care visits by a suitably trained physiotherapist using a validated tool’ (1 = strongly disagree; 6 = strongly agree)a ⩾70% participants agreeing/disagreeing ⩾60% but <70% participants agreeing/disagreeing <60% participants agreeing/disagreeing
Ranking Participants asked to rank multiple options in terms of importance from ‘1’ (most important) to ‘4’ (least important) in Round 1 or from ‘1’ (most important) to ‘3’ (least important) in Round 217 ‘Please rank the following recommendations in terms of their importance when offering a further round of ITI to patients who inadequately respond to their first round of ITI at the full dose of 200 IU/kg/day (1 = most important; 3 = least important) pdFVIII alone pdFVIII and immunosuppression Immunosuppression alonea Kendall’s W statistic (W) ⩾0.7 0.6 ⩽ W < 0.7 W < 0.6
Single-option Participants asked to select one answer from multiple options23,24 ‘What annual bleed rate do you feel justifies prophylaxis in adults?’a ⩾70% participants choosing the same option ⩾60% but <70% participants choosing the same option <60% participants choosing the same option
Numerical A free-text, open-ended question where participants were asked to provide a numerical response17 ‘Based on your response to the previous question, what percentage reduction in joint bleeds (any severity) on prophylaxis would you then consider to be a clinically significant improvement in adults?’b Consensus not assessedc Responses used to inform questions in subsequent round Responses used to inform questions in subsequent round
Free-text questions Optional free-text, open-ended questions both in the survey, and at the end of each questionnaire section (to allow participants to provide context to their responses)17 ‘How should mild/moderate haemophilia A patients with inhibitors be treated to eradicate their inhibitors?’b‘If you have any additional comments related to prophylaxis, please add them to this text box’d Consensus not assessedc Responses used to inform questions in subsequent round Responses used to inform questions in subsequent round

Participants could also select DNW for any questions they did not wish to answer, and in Round 2 an IE option was also added.

a

Example question from the Round 2 questionnaire.

b

Example question from the Round 1 questionnaire.

c

Responses instead used to inform the questions in subsequent round.

d

Example question from the Round 2 questionnaire whereby participants could add additional details at the end of a questionnaire section.

DNW, do not wish to answer; IE, insufficient expertise; ITI, immune tolerance induction; IU, international units; pdFVIII, plasma-derived factor VIII.