Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;373:n991. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n991

Table 3.

Safety outcomes (presented as rates per 100 person years after application of overlap weighting) in patients undergoing rhythm or rate control

Outcome Early AF treatment (≤1 year since diagnosis) Late AF treatment (>1 year since diagnosis)
Rhythm control (n=9246) Rate control (n=7077) Absolute rate difference per 100 person years (95% CI) Rhythm control (n=4407) Rate control (n=1905) Absolute rate difference per 100 person years (95% CI)
Composite safety outcome 9.56 9.54 0.01 (−1.14 to 1.17)* 11.13 9.83 1.30 (−0.72 to 3.32)†
All cause death 4.64 5.43 −0.79 (−1.60 to 0.02) 5.57 5.99 −0.42 (−1.86 to 1.02)
Intracranial bleeding 0.86 0.90 −0.04 (−0.38 to 0.29) 0.61 1.06 −0.45 (−1.00 to 0.10)
Gastrointestinal bleeding 1.78 2.30 −0.52 (−1.04 to 0.00) 2.45 2.78 −0.33 (−1.32 to 0.66)
Serious adverse event related to rhythm control:
 Cardiac tamponade 0.15 0.07 0.07 (−0.05 to 0.19) 0.24 0.07 0.17 (−0.07 to 0.41)
 Syncope 1.69 1.41 0.28 (−0.17 to 0.74) 2.00 1.07 0.93 (0.17 to 1.68)
 Sick sinus syndrome 1.29 0.47 0.82 (0.47 to 1.17) 1.48 0.35 1.12 (0.54 to 1.71)
 Atrioventricular block 0.50 0.24 0.25 (0.03 to 0.48) 0.33 0.24 0.09 (−0.24 to 0.41)
 Pacemaker implantation 0.54 0.29 0.25 (0.01 to 0.49) 0.53 0.22 0.31 (−0.06 to 0.69)
 Sudden cardiac arrest 0.69 0.61 0.08 (−0.21 to 0.37) 0.56 0.72 −0.15 (−0.63 to 0.33)

AF=atrial fibrillation.

*

The risk of composite safety outcome did not significantly differ according to treatment strategies with a weighted hazard ratio of 1.00 (95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.23).

The risk of composite safety outcome did not significantly differ according to treatment strategies with a weighted hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.37).