Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2020 Mar 27;59(7):5116–5132. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00372

Table 5.

The Relative Free Energies (kJ·mol−1) at 298 K of DFT-Optimized Conformations for Lu3+ and La3+ Complexes Formed with OxyMepa and Oxyaapa. The Enantiomeric Pair with the Lowest Calculated Energy of Each Complex is Referenced as Zero.

ΔG(Lu-OxyMepa) ΔG(Lu-Oxyaapa) ΔG(La-OxyMepa, q = 1) ΔG(La-OxyMepa, q = 2) ΔG(La-Oxyaapa)
anti conformations N1SN2S(λλ) / N1RN2R(δδ) +34.7 +17.4 +17.0 --b +21.2
N1SN2S(λδ) / N1RN2R(δλ) +6.2 0a +0.5 +11.3 +19.8
N1SN2S(δλ) / N1RN2R(λδ) +40.9 +7.0 +15.8 +7.8 +10.0
N1SN2S(δδ) / N1RN2R(λλ) +27.3 +7.2 0 +12.0 +21.6
syn confromations N1SN2R(λλ) / N1RN2S(δδ) +19.8 +20.9 +14.3 +8.8 +8.0
N1SN2R(λδ) / N1RN2S(δλ) +35.0 +23.0 +14.8 +16.3 +12.5
N1SN2R(δλ) / N1RN2S(λδ) 0a +9.1 +5.5 --b 0
N1SN2R(δδ) / N1RN2S(λλ) +22.5 +22.0 +10.4 0 +13.9
a

The conformation found in the crystal structure.

b

One inner-sphere water molecule moved to the outer-sphere during the optimization.