Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2020 Dec 11;88:101814. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101814

Table 2:

Statistical Results of Different Models on Different Metrics with Data Split 1. (a) Train classification model with raw CT data. (b) Train classification model with data masked by ground-truth segmentation. (c) Train classification model with data masked by automatically generated segmentation map (ours1). (d) Jointly train classification model and segmentation model (ours2). (e) Multi-task learning model with segmentation and classification.

Accuracy(%) AveF1(%)

(a) (b) (c)(ours1) (d)(ours2) (e) (a) (b) (c)(ours1) (d)(ours2) (e)
1) 55.73±0.34 59.11±0.33 57.78±0.24 58.67±0.27 57.33±0.51 55.19±0.35 58.88±0.38 58.04±0.31 58.30±0.31 56.72±0.46
2) 74.22±0.37 78.22±0.31 76.89±0.25 78.22±0.27 74.33±0.31 74.27±0.31 78.62±0.37 75.69±0.29 77.53±0.25 72.06±0.42
3) 82.22±0.31 83.56±0.35 82.67±0.27 82.67±0.27 81.33±0.45 80.74±0.31 82.27±0.39 81.12±0.25 81.32±0.25 80.74±0.41
4) 67.29±0.51 72.32±0.38 71.70±0.31 72.30±0.30 67.67±0.33 67.29±0.43 72.95±0.35 70.34±0.35 72.22±0.21 65.78±0.49
MCC(×10−1) AUC(×10−1)

(a) (b) (c)(ours1) (d)(ours2) (e) (a) (b) (c)(ours1) (d)(ours2) (e)

1) 3.259±0.057 3.561±0.054 3.415±0.037 3.430±0.035 3.238±0.047 - - - - -
2) 4.121±0.039 5.128±0.031 4.467±0.041 4.828±0.037 4.239±0.045 7.441±0.031 8.140±0.038 7.943±0.039 8.129±0.031 7.483±0.045
3) 4.692±0.033 5.134±0.031 4.819±0.025 4.852±0.021 4.548±0.038 7.852±0.031 8.044±0.036 7.884±0.039 7.998±0.041 7.802±0.046
4) 3.000±0.039 4.051±0.039 3.931±0.021 4.029±0.021 3.120±0.048 6.557±0.023 7.542±0.035 7.437±0.031 7.412±0.034 6.809±0.048