Table 8.
Snead et al. 2016[1] | Mukhopadhyay et al. 2017[11] | Borowsky et al. 2020[28] | Current study | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Overall major discrepancy among pathologists using glass slides (%) | 0.4 | 4.6 | 3.2 | --* |
Overall major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) (%) | 0.7 | 4.9 | 3.6 | 2.9 |
Major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) in GIT (%) | 0.4 | <1 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
Major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) in gynaecological pathology (%) | 0.26 | 3.1 | 3.18 | 3.2 |
Major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) in dermatopathology (%) | 0.7 | 4.9 | 4.74 | 2.8 |
Major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) in uropathology (%) | 2.4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
*3%: Average of existing discrepancy rate from Welsh external quality assurance scheme and Glan Clwyd Hospital intra departmental audit. WSI: Whole slide imaging, GIT: Gastrointestinal tract, GT: Ground truth