Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 23;12:4. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_55_20

Table 8.

Comparison of discrepancies with similar studies in literature

Snead et al. 2016[1] Mukhopadhyay et al. 2017[11] Borowsky et al. 2020[28] Current study
Overall major discrepancy among pathologists using glass slides (%) 0.4 4.6 3.2 --*
Overall major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) (%) 0.7 4.9 3.6 2.9
Major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) in GIT (%) 0.4 <1 3.3 3.1
Major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) in gynaecological pathology (%) 0.26 3.1 3.18 3.2
Major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) in dermatopathology (%) 0.7 4.9 4.74 2.8
Major discrepancy between WSI and signed out report (GT) in uropathology (%) 2.4 5 3 5

*3%: Average of existing discrepancy rate from Welsh external quality assurance scheme and Glan Clwyd Hospital intra departmental audit. WSI: Whole slide imaging, GIT: Gastrointestinal tract, GT: Ground truth