Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 27;12:665541. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.665541

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of the mean percentages of NK subsets expressing CD159a and KIR receptors within the bone marrow microenvironment of NBM, MDS, and AML cases. (A–D) Left panel: CD56bright CD94hi CD16- CD57- immature NK subset; middle panel: CD56dim CD94med CD16+ CD57- mature NK subset; right panel: CD56dim CD94low CD16+ CD57+ hypermature NK subset; (A) Percentage of bone marrow CD159a-positive NK subsets in normal bone marrow (NBM, n = 30), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS, n = 25), and acute myeloid leukemias (AML, n = 8) cases. Bars represent the mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05, ns, not significant; one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test; only for comparing immature NK subsets of NBM vs. MDS: Mann Whitney test). (B) Percentage of bone marrow CD158a-positive NK subsets in NBM (n = 30), MDS (n = 24), and AML (n = 8) cases. Bars represent the mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05, ns, not significant; one-tailed Mann Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s Multiple Comparison tests for immature and mature NK subsets, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test for hypermature NK subsets). (C) Percentage of bone marrow CD158b-positive NK subsets in NBM (n = 30), MDS (n = 25), and AML (n = 8) cases. Bars represent the mean ± SEM (**P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, ns, not significant; Mann Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s Multiple Comparison tests for immature and mature NK subsets, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test for hypermature NK subsets). (D) Percentage of bone marrow CD158e1-positive NK subsets in NBM (n = 30), MDS (n = 25), and AML (n = 8) cases. Bars represent the mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05, ns, not significant; Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s Multiple Comparison test).