Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Nov 23;218:108426. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108426

Liver Injury Associated with Kratom, A Popular Opioid-Like Product: Experience from the U.S. Drug Induced liver Injury Network

Jawad Ahmad 1, Joseph A Odin 2, Paul H Hayashi 3, Robert J Fontana 4, Hari Conjeevaram 5, Bharathi Avula 6, Ikhlas A Khan 7, Huiman Barnhart 8, Raj Vuppalanchi 9, Victor J Navarro 10; Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network
PMCID: PMC8113016  NIHMSID: NIHMS1696448  PMID: 33257199

Abstract

Background

Kratom is a botanical product used as an opium substitute with abuse potential.

Methods

Assessment of suspected cases of kratom-induced liver injury in a prospective US cohort.

Results

Eleven cases of liver injury attributed to kratom were identified with a recent increase. The majority were male with median age 40 years. All were symptomatic and developed jaundice with a median latency of 14 days. The liver injury pattern was variable, most required hospitalization and all eventually recovered. Biochemical analysis revealed active kratom ingredients.

Conclusion

Kratom can cause severe liver injury with jaundice.

Keywords: Kratom, hepatotoxicity, mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, opioid

Background

Kratom is a botanical product extracted from the tropical evergreen tree, Mitragyna speciosa, taken as a tea or chewable leaves (1). Low dose kratom has stimulant effects, but a sedative narcotic effect at higher doses with many adverse events reported (2). Kratom’s most important components, mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, have psychoactive effects acting as μ-opioid receptor agonists (1). Kratom is readily available online and in herbal medicine it is used as an opium substitute to reduce withdrawal symptoms (3). The National Poison Data System reported 1800 cases of kratom poisoning from 2011–2017, with two thirds occurring in 2016–2017 (4).

The U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) has prospectively enrolled cases of liver injury due to drugs and herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) since 2003 (5). Patients with suspected DILI undergo testing to exclude alternative causes of liver injury and expert opinion determines whether the liver injury is due to a drug or HDS. The aim of this study is to describe the DILIN’s experience with kratom-induced liver injury. Available kratom products were analyzed at the National Center for Natural Products Research (NCNPR) at the University of Mississippi for the presence of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine.

Methods

Suspected cases of DILI within 6 months of injury onset meeting predefined laboratory criteria are prospectively enrolled in DILIN. Eligibility criteria include total bilirubin ≥2.5 mg/dL or INR >1.5 and any elevation in alanine or aspartate aminotransferase (ALT or AST) or alkaline phosphatase (AlkP) levels; or elevations of ALT or AST above 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or AlkP above 2 times ULN on 2 consecutive measurements at least 24 hours apart. All non-drug or non-HDS causes for liver injury are excluded.

A standardized protocol assesses the relationship between the use of a medication or HDS and liver injury (6). Causality is graded by expert consensus opinion as either definite (>95% likelihood), highly likely (75–95%), probable (50–74%), possible (25–49%) or unlikely (<25%).

In HDS suspected cases, available product is analyzed at the NCNPR to verify the product label, and to search for common hepatotoxins. High resolution HLA Class I and II gene sequencing on whole blood DNA is performed in the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Immunogenomics, Microbial Genetics and Single Cell Technologies core.

Results

Between 2003 and 2019, 404 cases of liver injury associated with HDS were enrolled into DILIN. Of these, 11 cases with definite, highly likely or probable causality were attributed to kratom (table 1). Cases occurred infrequently until 2019, when 4 cases were enrolled (Figure 1). Of the 11 cases, 9 were male, median age was 40 years with a median 14 days of kratom use prior to DILI onset. The median latency before symptom onset was 14 days and laboratory abnormalities was 21 days. One patient was abusing alcohol (3 had a remote history of heavy use) and kratom was used for several reasons. At presentation, all were symptomatic. Ten patients had an initial bilirubin greater than 2.5mg/dL and all 11 developed jaundice (median peak total bilirubin 11.7 mg/dL). The initial median serum ALT was 362 U/L and median AlkP 255 U/L with 6 of 11 having a mixed pattern of liver injury (R value 2–5). Autoimmune serology was negative. Eight patients were hospitalized and 3 developed an elevated INR, with no fatalities. Ten patients recovered completely by 6 months and most had a rapid improvement. One patient had mildly elevated liver biochemical tests that normalized at 1 year.

Table 1-.

Clinical features of 11 patients with acute liver injury due to Kratom.

Total (N=11)
Median Age/years (range) 40 (25–70)
Male 9
Caucasian 9
Median BMI kg/m2 (range) 24.8 (20.6–28.3)
Median Duration of use/days (range) 14 (5 – 23)
Median Latency to symptoms/days (range) 14 (5 – 28)
Alcohol use 7
Onset Peak
Median ALT, U/L (range) 362 (52–1028) 406 (62–1028)
Median AlkP, U/L (range) 255 (119–360) 292 (195–836)
Median Total bilirubin, mg/dL (range) 8.9 (0.9–38.2) 11.7 (4.5–41.1)
Median INR (range) 0.9 (0.9–3.2) 1.1 (1–3.2)
RUCAM (range) 7 (2–9)
R value at onset
Cholestatic
Mixed
Hepatocellular

2
6
3
Median R value at onset (range) 3.2 (0.7 – 13.4)
Median Time to recovery/days (range) 90 (34–365)
DILIN severity score
 - 1 (mild) none
 - 2 (moderate) 2 of 11
 - 3 (jaundice, hospitalized) 6 of 11
 - 4 (features of hepatic failure) 3 of 11
 - 5 (death or liver transplant) none

Figure 1-.

Figure 1-

Temporal trend of Kratom liver injury enrolled in the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network 2004–2019.

Biochemical analysis of 3 products revealed the presence of mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine with no other pharmaceutical adulterants, toxicants, or contaminants. Genetic analysis revealed that one patient carried the minor allele (A nucleotide) of the PTPN22 SNP rs2476601. Seven of eight European Americans had either HLA-B*57:01 or HLA-B*44:03 alleles; both had the same allele frequencies (AF=0.25), but higher than their corresponding AF in the general population (AF=0.04 and 0.05). In total, four patients carried one HLA-B*57:01 allele, and three patients carried HLA-B*44:01 but one had homozygous HLA-B*44:03.

Discussion:

Between 2004–2019, 2193 cases of suspected DILI were enrolled in the prospective DILIN registry with 1950 adjudicated for causality. Among those adjudicated, 369 (19%) were attributed to HDS. Thus, these 11 cases of kratom associated liver injury represents approximately 3% of cases of HDS related liver injury and 1% of cases overall. Importantly, only 3 cases were enrolled during the first 10 years, with 8 enrolled in the last 3 years. The increasing use of kratom is illustrated by increasing reports of related toxicity and deaths, partially because of its purported effects in ameliorating opioid withdrawal (2). The typical patient was a healthy male presenting with jaundice, itching and a mixed or cholestatic pattern of injury. The latency to onset was invariably short, ranging from 5–28 days. Immunoallergic and autoimmune features were not prominent. All 11 patients recovered with no evidence of chronic injury although several cases were severe and associated with significant hepatic dysfunction.

Although no patient died from liver failure in this series, kratom use can be fatal with the Centers for Disease Control reporting 90 kratom-related deaths due to respiratory depression and coma (2). Because of the lack of pharmacological data on kratom, the FDA evaluated a biologic simulation model of the product’s constituents and noted structural similarities between kratom and opioids with several ingredients predicted to bind to μ-opioid receptors and to behave as opioid agonists (7).

To date, 6 reports of Kratom associated liver injury have been published with a recent review of 26 cases that were 65% male with a median age of 32 years (8). The common presentations were abdominal discomfort, jaundice and other cholestatic symptoms, with median latency to onset of 22 days and cholestasis commonly seen on liver biopsy.

The small sample size limited the genetic analysis. HLA B*57:01 and B*44:03 had a higher allelic frequency than the general population and 10 of 11 patients were homozygous for the PTPN22 G allele (9, 10). Only 1 patient had HLA*B35:01 that has been linked to other forms of HDS DILI (11).

In summary, kratom is readily available and, using the DILIN as a bellwether for use in the population, may be an increasingly frequent cause of DILI. Practitioners should be aware of the risk of severe liver injury.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1- Clinical features of 11 patients with acute liver injury due to Kratom 2007-2019.

Funding source:

The Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) is structured as an U01 cooperative agreement supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with funds provided by the following grants: U01DK065211 (Indiana University [Purdue]), U01DK065184 (University of Michigan [Ann Arbor]), U01DK065201 (University of North Carolina [Chapel Hill], Asheville, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center), U01DK083027 (Albert Einstein Medical Center), U01DK100928 (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), U01DK065176 (Duke Clinical Research Institute). Additional support was provided by the Intramural Division of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH.

Contributor Information

Jawad Ahmad, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine.

Joseph A Odin, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine.

Paul H Hayashi, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Robert J Fontana, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.

Hari Conjeevaram, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.

Bharathi Avula, National Center for Natural Products Research at the University of Mississippi.

Ikhlas A Khan, National Center for Natural Products Research at the University of Mississippi.

Huiman Barnhart, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Raj Vuppalanchi, Department of Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine.

Victor J Navarro, Department of Digestive Disease and Transplantation, Einstein Healthcare Network.

References

  • 1.Hassan Z, Muzaimi M, Navaratnam V, et al. From Kratom to mitragynine and its derivatives: physiological and behavioural effects related to use, abuse, and addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013;37:138–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olsen EO, O’Donnell J, Mattson CL, et al. Notes from the Field: Unintentional Drug Overdose Deaths with Kratom Detected - 27 States, July 2016-December 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:326–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coe MA, Pillitteri JL, Sembower MA, et al. Kratom as a substitute for opioids: Results from an online survey. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019;202:24–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Post S, Spiller HA, Chounthirath T, Smith GA. Kratom exposures reported to United States poison control centers: 2011–2017. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2019;57:847–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chalasani N, Bonkovsky HL, Fontana R, et al. Features and Outcomes of 899 Patients With Drug-Induced Liver Injury: The DILIN Prospective Study. Gastroenterology 2015;148:1340–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fontana RJ, Watkins PB, Bonkovsky HL, et al. Rationale, design and conduct of the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network prospective study. Drug Saf. 2009;32:55–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ellis CR, Racz R, Kruhlak NL, et al. Evaluating kratom alkaloids using PHASE. PLoS One 2020;15(3):e0229646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229646. eCollection 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schimmel J, Dart RC. Kratom (Mitragyna Speciosa) Liver Injury: A Comprehensive Review. Drugs 2020;80:263–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nicoletti P, Aithal GP, Bjornsson ES et al. Association of Liver Injury From Specific Drugs, or Groups of Drugs, With Polymorphisms in HLA and Other Genes in a Genome-Wide Association Study. Gastroenterology 2017;152:1078–1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cirulli ET, Nicoletti P, Abramson K et al. A Missense Variant in PTPN22 is a Risk Factor for Drug-induced Liver Injury. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1707–1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li C, Rao T, Chen X, et al. HLA-B*35:01 allele is a potential biomarker for predicting Polygonum multiflorum-induced liver injury. Hepatology 2019; 70:346–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1- Clinical features of 11 patients with acute liver injury due to Kratom 2007-2019.

RESOURCES