Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ocul Surf. 2020 Nov 26;20:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2020.11.011

Table 4.

Correlation Coefficients Between Cholesteryl Esters and Rosiglitazone

Cholesteryl Ester (CE) Correlation Coefficient (ρ) Significance (p-value) Cholesteryl Ester (CE) Correlation Coefficient (ρ) Significance (p-value)
CE 14:0 0.127 0.389 CE 22:6 −0.094 0.525
CE 15:0 −0.230 0.116 CE 22:5 −0.089 0.549
CE 16:2 −0.469 0.001 CE 22:4 −0.209 0.154
CE 16:1 0.273 0.061 CE 22:3 −0.077 0.602
CE 16:0 0.337 0.019 CE 22:2 −0.086 0.561
CE 17:1 −0.011 0.941 CE 22:1 0.500 <0.001
CE 17:0 −0.063 0.670 CE 24:2 0.227 0.122
CE 18:3 −0.011 0.940 CE 24:1 0.698 <0.001
CE 18:2 −0.041 0.785 CE 24:0 0.453 0.001
CE 18:1 −0.589 <0.001 CE 26:2 0.168 0.253
CE 18:0 0.426 0.003 CE 26:1 0.656 <0.001
CE 19:1 −0.187 0.203 CE 26:0 0.130 0.378
CE 20:5 −0.295 0.042 CE 27:3 0.026 0.862
CE 20:4 0.133 0.369 CE 28:1 0.694 <0.001
CE 20:3 −0.300 0.038 CE 30:1 0.245 0.093
CE 20:2 −0.346 0.016 CE 32:1 −0.085 0.566
CE 20:1 −0.022 0.881 CE 34:1 −0.384 0.007

Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated between each cholesteryl ester (CE) and rosiglitazone. CEs are listed with two numbers. The two numbers denote the number of carbons and double bonds in the acyl chains, respectively. All correlations are positive unless otherwise denoted. Thirteen CEs (bolded) reached statistical significance. Five of these CEs had moderate to high correlations: CE 24:1, CE 28:1, CE 26:1, CE 18:1, and CE 22:1. n = 48 for each CE.