Table 3.
Performance of prediction models for predicting subtypes in NSCLC
Training set | AUC (95% CI) | Sen (%) | Spe (%) | Acc (%) |
Clin-Lab Model | 0.887 (0.843–0.931) | 78.57 | 88.75 | 80.91 |
PET-Rad Model | 0.835 (0.780–0.890) | 90.00 | 62.50 | 78.64 |
CT-Rad Model | 0.784 (0.733–0.855) | 69.29 | 81.25 | 75.00 |
Combined Model | 0.932 (0.900–0.964) | 96.25 | 95.00 | 84.09 |
Validation set | AUC (95% CI) | Sen (%) | Spe (%) | Acc (%) |
Clin-Lab Model | 0.860 (0.789–0.931) | 80.65 | 76.56 | 72.63 |
PET-Rad Model | 0.740 (0.639–0.840) | 83.87 | 75.00 | 66.32 |
CT-Rad Model | 0.710 (0.606–0.815) | 70.97 | 60.94 | 68.42 |
Combined Model | 0.901 (0.840–0.957) | 93.55 | 81.25 | 85.95 |
Clin-Lab Clinical-Laboratory, PET-Rad positron emission tomography-radiomics, CT-Rad computed tomography-radiomics, AUC area under the receiver operating curve, CI confidence interval, Sen sensitivity, Spe specificity, Acc accuracy