Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 1;31(6):2511–2519. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05287-z

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics

ENPT SEMS P
Time interval between SG procedure and diagnosis of leak (days) 25.50 ± 22.67, (3–61) 45 ± 83.83, (1–296) 0.73
Diagnosis of leak during index admission for SG 2/14 (14.3%) 2/13 (15.4%) 0.56
Detection of leak in CT scan 9/14 (64.3%) 9/13 (69.2%) 0.34
Detection of leak in endoscopy 5/14 (35.7%) 4/13 (30.8%) 0.78
Pathological CT scan findings
Not documented 0 1 (7.7%) 0.542
Not suspicious for leak 1 (7.1%) 0
Collection/abcess < 2cm 2 (14.3%) 0
Collection/abcess 2–5cm 3 (21.4%) 2 (15.4%)
Collection/abcess > 5cm 2 (14.3%) 4 (30.8%)
Extraluminal air 4 (28.6%) 5 (41.7%)
Extraluminal oral contrast 1 (7.7%) 1 (7.7%)
Detection of leak during index endoscopy 14/14 (100%) 13/13 (100%) --
Location of leak
G-E junction 11 (78.6%) 13 (100%) 0.20
G-E junction and mid gastric 2 (14.3%) 0
Distal gastric 1 (12.5%) 0
Leak onset [29]
Early (d 1–3) 1 (7.1%) 1 (7.7%) 0.83
Intermediate (d 4–7) 2 (14.3%) 3 (23.1%)
Late (d 8 or more) 11 (78.6%) 9 (69.2%)
Number of leaks
One 12 (85.7%) 11 (84.6%) 0.99
Two 1 (7.1%) 1 (7.7%)
Three 1 (7.1%) 1 (7.7%)
Size of leak
< 5 mm 9 (64.3%) 7 (63.6%) 0.64
5–10 mm 5 (35.7%) 4 (36.4%)
Concomitant sleeve stenosis
Yes 1 (7.1%) 3 (23.1%) 0.26
No 13 (92.9%) 10 (76.9%)