Table 2.
The sustainable suburb scenario
| Population density | Vehicle miles traveled | Greenhouse gas emissions | Park space | Water quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental | ||||
| A minimum of 2,500 people per square mile |
Low to medium. Under 10,000 miles per year. Increased use of electric vehicles. |
Low | 10 acres or more per 1,000 residents |
Good quality. Little stormwater runoff with use of green infrastructure. |
| Housing | Transportation | Health | Park space | Beauty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social | ||||
| More multi-family housing |
More walking, biking, and transit. Less driving. |
Better air quality, More physical activity in walking and biking. |
Within a ten-minute walk of a park. | Nature and green infrastructure. |
| Housing | Infrastructure | Health | Jobs | Overall cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic | ||||
|
End exclusionary zoning. Greater mix of housing types and affordability of housing. Energy efficient buildings. |
Fewer roads and utilities. Renewable energy. |
Lower health costs with less commuting and more physical activity. |
More people working from home. Lower com-muting costs. |
Lower housing, transportation, infrastructure, and health costs. Savings from greater climate resilience. |