Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;62(Suppl 1):i129–i139. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraa134

Table 4.

Results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showing factors associated with the frequency of new onset of dyslipidemia.

Factors Classification No dyslipidemia (n = 6149) Dyslipidemia (n = 1868) Age- and sex- adjusted OR (95% CI) P value Multiple adjusted OR (95% CI) a (n = 8017) P value
Age (years) Continuous 63 ± 8 62 ± 8 0.99 (0.98–0.99) <0.001 0.99 (0.98–0.99) <0.001
Follow-up period (person-years) Continuous 3.4 ± 0.6 3.4 ± 0.6 1.06 (0.98–1.16) 0.151 1.04 (0.95–1.14) 0.377
Sex Men 2636 (42.9) 793 (42.5) Ref. Ref.
Women 3513 (57.1) 1075 (57.5) 1.00 (0.90–1.11) 0.926 0.99 (0.89–1.11) 0.907
Active lifestyle No 5441 (88.5) 1694 (90.7) Ref. Ref.
Yes 708 (11.5) 174 (9.3) 0.82 (0.69–0.98) 0.031 0.82 (0.68–0.97) 0.024
Skipping breakfast (≥3 days/week) No 5997 (97.8) 1801 (96.8) Ref.
Yes 136 (2.2) 59 (3.2) 1.34 (0.98–1.83) 0.071
Obesity (BMI ≥25) No 4839 (78.7) 1340 (71.7) Ref. Ref.
Yes 1310 (21.3) 528 (28.3) 1.47 (1.31–1.66) <0.001 1.46 (1.29–1.64) <0.001
Experience of evacuation No 4072 (66.2) 1157 (61.9) Ref. Ref.
Yes 2077 (33.8) 711 (38.1) 1.19 (1.07–1.32) 0.002 1.14 (1.02–1.28) 0.019

aAdjusted for age, follow-up period, sex, active lifestyle, obesity and experience of evacuation. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Ref, reference; BMI, body mass index. Logistic regression model. Two-sided P values <0.05 were considered indicative of statistical significance.