Table 1. Total number of participants in each of the pre-defined subgroups.
| Previous screening behaviour | IMD† quintile | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most deprived | 2 | 3 | 4 | Least deprived | ||||
| Up-to-date‡ | Age group | Younger (25–30) | 12 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 53 |
| Older (30–65) | 11 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 45 | ||
| Overdue/Never screened | Age group | Younger (25–30) | 3 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 18 |
| Older (30–65) | 3 | 8 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 29 | ||
| Total | Age group | Younger (25–30) | 15 | 24 | 19 | 8 | 5 | 71 |
| Older (30–65) | 14 | 18 | 17 | 10 | 15 | 74 | ||
| Total | 29 | 42 | 36 | 18 | 20 | 145 | ||
Notes: †IMD Index of multiple deprivation based on participant postcodes. 145 participants provided postcodes which could be converted into IMD quintiles. ‡Participants were classified as up-to-date with screening if they were aged 25–49 and had been screened in the past 3 years, or were aged 50–65 and had been screened in the past 5 years.