Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 10;7(1):128–146. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2019.1600407

Table 3. Satisfaction and evaluation questionnaire results.

Satisfaction and Evaluation Questions Overall (n = 18) Indirect Intervention (n = 9) Mean (SD) Direct Intervention (n = 9) Mean (SD) Effect size d
Information provided in workbooks: Quite or extremely interesting 14/18 (77.8%) 6/9 (66.7%) 2.67 (0.87) 8/9 (88.9%) 3.00 (0.50) 0.48
Learned anything new from the workbooks: Learned quite a bit or a lot 8/18 (44.4%) 3/9 (33.3%) 2.22 (0.97) 5/9 (55.65) 2.67 (0.71) 0.54
Used the tools and strategies provided in the workbooks: Used quite a bit or a lot 11/18 (61.1%) 6/9 (66.7%) 2.89 (1.05) 5/9 (55.6%) 2.56 (0.53) −0.42
Tools provided in workbooks helped increase physical activity: Helped quite a bit or a lot 11/18 (61.1%) 6/9 (66.7%) 3.00 (1.12) 5/9 (55.6%) 3.00 (0.87) 0.00
Learn any new information working with the researcher: Learned quite a bit or a lot 10/18 (55.6%) 4/9 (44.4%) 2.44 (0.53) 6/9 (66.7%) 2.89 (0.78) 0.68
Used the tools discussed during counselling sessions: Used quite a bit or a lot 13/18 (72%) 5/9 (55.6%) 3.00 (1.00) 8/9 (88.9%) 3.22 (0.67) 0.26
Counselling sessions helped to increase PA: Quite helpful or extremely helpful 16/18 (88.9%) 7/9 (77.8%) 3.22 (0.83) 9/9 (100.0%) 3.22 (0.44) 0.00
Amount of exposure to counselling sessions: Good amount 17/18 (94.4%) 9/9 (100%) 2.00 (0.00) 8/9 (88.9%) 1.89 (0.33) −0.67
Effectiveness of material delivery: Quite effectively or extremely well delivered 16/18 (88.9%) 8/9 (88.9%) 3.33 (0.71) 8/9 (88.9%) 3.44 (0.73) 0.15

Note: ‘Amount of exposure to counselling sessions’ ranked from 1 (not enough) to 3 (too much), with 2 being good amount